SmogRank / Cleaner or dirtier / Germany
Germany: cleaner or dirtier, 2026
In Germany, 243 cities have enough days in both years to compare 2026 so far (1 January to 6 October) with the same days of 2025: 123 got dirtier and 109 cleaner.
The 123 cities that got dirtier, biggest rise first
| # | City | 2025 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burg bei MagdeburgSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 51 | 58 | +3.8 µg/m³+42% |
| 2 | Halle (Saale)Saxony-Anhalt, Germany | 53 | 58 | +2.9 µg/m³+29% |
| 3 | FürstenbergBrandenburg, Germany | 49 | 55 | +2.4 µg/m³+27% |
| 4 | ThaleSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 37 | 49 | +2.3 µg/m³+35% |
| 5 | EisenhüttenstadtBrandenburg, Germany | 53 | 58 | +2.3 µg/m³+22% |
| 6 | Bitterfeld-WolfenSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 53 | 58 | +2.3 µg/m³+22% |
| 7 | LudwigslustMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 49 | 55 | +2.3 µg/m³+26% |
| 8 | KiefersfeldenBavaria, Germany | 54 | 58 | +2.2 µg/m³+21% |
| 9 | Schwedt (Oder)Brandenburg, Germany | 51 | 55 | +2.0 µg/m³+22% |
| 10 | TrappenkampSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 41 | 52 | +2.0 µg/m³+27% |
| 11 | MalchowMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 48 | 54 | +1.9 µg/m³+22% |
| 12 | MagdeburgSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 54 | 58 | +1.9 µg/m³+18% |
| 13 | Brandenburg an der HavelBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 55 | +1.8 µg/m³+19% |
| 14 | NeubrandenburgMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 55 | 58 | +1.8 µg/m³+16% |
| 15 | Blankenfelde-MahlowBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 56 | +1.8 µg/m³+18% |
| 16 | NeuruppinBrandenburg, Germany | 46 | 53 | +1.8 µg/m³+22% |
| 17 | HalberstadtSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 53 | 57 | +1.7 µg/m³+16% |
| 18 | Bad BelzigBrandenburg, Germany | 49 | 54 | +1.7 µg/m³+19% |
| 19 | WismarMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 52 | 55 | +1.6 µg/m³+17% |
| 20 | OtterndorfLower Saxony, Germany | 48 | 53 | +1.6 µg/m³+19% |
| 21 | BerlinState of Berlin, Germany | 58 | 61 | +1.5 µg/m³+12% |
| 22 | Königs WusterhausenBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 55 | +1.5 µg/m³+15% |
| 23 | CuxhavenLower Saxony, Germany | 48 | 53 | +1.5 µg/m³+17% |
| 24 | DessauSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 55 | 58 | +1.4 µg/m³+12% |
| 25 | CottbusBrandenburg, Germany | 53 | 56 | +1.4 µg/m³+13% |
| 26 | NauenBrandenburg, Germany | 53 | 55 | +1.4 µg/m³+14% |
| 27 | LubnjowBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 54 | +1.4 µg/m³+15% |
| 28 | Dallgow-DöberitzBrandenburg, Germany | 47 | 52 | +1.4 µg/m³+17% |
| 29 | WittingenLower Saxony, Germany | 51 | 54 | +1.4 µg/m³+15% |
| 30 | UnnaNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 57 | 59 | +1.3 µg/m³+11% |
| 31 | MühlhausenThuringia, Germany | 54 | 56 | +1.3 µg/m³+12% |
| 32 | NorderneyLower Saxony, Germany | 51 | 54 | +1.3 µg/m³+14% |
| 33 | EmdenLower Saxony, Germany | 51 | 54 | +1.3 µg/m³+14% |
| 34 | Hansestadt SalzwedelSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 47 | 52 | +1.3 µg/m³+15% |
| 35 | LüchowLower Saxony, Germany | 47 | 52 | +1.3 µg/m³+15% |
| 36 | OranienburgBrandenburg, Germany | 54 | 57 | +1.3 µg/m³+12% |
| 37 | Frankfurt (Oder)Brandenburg, Germany | 53 | 56 | +1.3 µg/m³+13% |
| 38 | KöthenSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 52 | 55 | +1.3 µg/m³+13% |
| 39 | Osternienburger LandSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 52 | 55 | +1.3 µg/m³+13% |
| 40 | PotsdamBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 55 | +1.3 µg/m³+13% |
| 41 | JorkLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 54 | +1.3 µg/m³+14% |
| 42 | BuxtehudeLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 54 | +1.3 µg/m³+14% |
| 43 | WernigerodeSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 52 | 54 | +1.2 µg/m³+13% |
| 44 | WeißenfelsSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 55 | 58 | +1.2 µg/m³+11% |
| 45 | FriesoytheLower Saxony, Germany | 54 | 56 | +1.2 µg/m³+11% |
| 46 | BöselLower Saxony, Germany | 54 | 56 | +1.2 µg/m³+11% |
| 47 | HannoverLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 54 | +1.2 µg/m³+13% |
| 48 | StrausbergBrandenburg, Germany | 51 | 54 | +1.2 µg/m³+13% |
| 49 | BraunschweigLower Saxony, Germany | 51 | 54 | +1.2 µg/m³+13% |
| 50 | WolfsburgLower Saxony, Germany | 51 | 53 | +1.1 µg/m³+12% |
| 51 | MahlowBrandenburg, Germany | 61 | 63 | +1.1 µg/m³+8% |
| 52 | SchwerinMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 53 | 55 | +1.1 µg/m³+11% |
| 53 | RostockMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 52 | 54 | +1.1 µg/m³+11% |
| 54 | Neustadt an der DonauBavaria, Germany | 50 | 53 | +1.1 µg/m³+12% |
| 55 | SalzgitterLower Saxony, Germany | 49 | 52 | +1.1 µg/m³+12% |
| 56 | LüneburgLower Saxony, Germany | 49 | 52 | +1.1 µg/m³+12% |
| 57 | LauenburgSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 47 | 52 | +1.1 µg/m³+13% |
| 58 | WittenbergeBrandenburg, Germany | 47 | 52 | +1.1 µg/m³+13% |
| 59 | BernburgSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 58 | 60 | +1.0 µg/m³+8% |
| 60 | WittenbergSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 56 | 58 | +1.0 µg/m³+8% |
| 61 | OldenburgLower Saxony, Germany | 55 | 56 | +1.0 µg/m³+9% |
| 62 | KelheimBavaria, Germany | 51 | 53 | +1.0 µg/m³+11% |
| 63 | GüstrowMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.9 µg/m³+10% |
| 64 | BützowMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 51 | 53 | +0.9 µg/m³+10% |
| 65 | WeimarThuringia, Germany | 53 | 54 | +0.8 µg/m³+8% |
| 66 | LindauBavaria, Germany | 53 | 54 | +0.8 µg/m³+8% |
| 67 | Bernau bei BerlinBrandenburg, Germany | 53 | 54 | +0.8 µg/m³+8% |
| 68 | NordhausenThuringia, Germany | 52 | 54 | +0.8 µg/m³+8% |
| 69 | KleinmachnowBrandenburg, Germany | 48 | 52 | +0.8 µg/m³+9% |
| 70 | Herrsching am AmmerseeBavaria, Germany | 43 | 48 | +0.8 µg/m³+10% |
| 71 | SondershausenThuringia, Germany | 43 | 48 | +0.8 µg/m³+10% |
| 72 | TarpSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 40 | 44 | +0.8 µg/m³+11% |
| 73 | ElsterwerdaBrandenburg, Germany | 53 | 55 | +0.8 µg/m³+8% |
| 74 | HalstenbekSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 52 | 54 | +0.8 µg/m³+8% |
| 75 | StralsundMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany | 51 | 53 | +0.8 µg/m³+9% |
| 76 | HildesheimLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.7 µg/m³+7% |
| 77 | KlötzeSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 45 | 49 | +0.7 µg/m³+9% |
| 78 | GoslarLower Saxony, Germany | 43 | 47 | +0.7 µg/m³+9% |
| 79 | HamburgGermany | 54 | 55 | +0.7 µg/m³+7% |
| 80 | ErfurtThuringia, Germany | 52 | 54 | +0.7 µg/m³+7% |
| 81 | StarnbergBavaria, Germany | 44 | 48 | +0.7 µg/m³+9% |
| 82 | UlmBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 54 | 55 | +0.6 µg/m³+6% |
| 83 | WalsrodeLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.6 µg/m³+6% |
| 84 | WieslochBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 52 | +0.6 µg/m³+7% |
| 85 | FürthHesse, Germany | 39 | 43 | +0.6 µg/m³+8% |
| 86 | SchöneicheBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.6 µg/m³+6% |
| 87 | ReutlingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.6 µg/m³+6% |
| 88 | NeuenhagenBrandenburg, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.6 µg/m³+6% |
| 89 | LingenLower Saxony, Germany | 49 | 52 | +0.6 µg/m³+7% |
| 90 | DelmenhorstLower Saxony, Germany | 48 | 51 | +0.6 µg/m³+7% |
| 91 | LemwerderLower Saxony, Germany | 48 | 51 | +0.6 µg/m³+7% |
| 92 | MüllheimBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 44 | 47 | +0.6 µg/m³+8% |
| 93 | Villingen-SchwenningenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 39 | 42 | +0.6 µg/m³+9% |
| 94 | LudwigsburgBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.5 µg/m³+5% |
| 95 | UslarLower Saxony, Germany | 41 | 44 | +0.5 µg/m³+7% |
| 96 | AltenburgThuringia, Germany | 54 | 55 | +0.4 µg/m³+4% |
| 97 | HeidelbergBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 52 | +0.4 µg/m³+4% |
| 98 | GöttingenLower Saxony, Germany | 50 | 52 | +0.4 µg/m³+4% |
| 99 | DuderstadtLower Saxony, Germany | 49 | 51 | +0.4 µg/m³+4% |
| 100 | WilhelmshavenLower Saxony, Germany | 47 | 49 | +0.4 µg/m³+5% |
| 101 | KahlaThuringia, Germany | 45 | 47 | +0.4 µg/m³+5% |
| 102 | LübeckSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 44 | 47 | +0.4 µg/m³+5% |
| 103 | TeltowBrandenburg, Germany | 56 | 56 | +0.3 µg/m³+3% |
| 104 | TübingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 54 | 54 | +0.3 µg/m³+3% |
| 105 | OsnabrückLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 53 | +0.3 µg/m³+3% |
| 106 | PforzheimBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 52 | +0.3 µg/m³+3% |
| 107 | EisenachThuringia, Germany | 51 | 52 | +0.3 µg/m³+3% |
| 108 | WarsteinNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 51 | 52 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 109 | AalenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 51 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 110 | MichelstadtHesse, Germany | 48 | 49 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 111 | OytenLower Saxony, Germany | 48 | 49 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 112 | FreiburgBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 48 | 49 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 113 | GeraThuringia, Germany | 53 | 54 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 114 | JenaThuringia, Germany | 53 | 53 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 115 | FriedrichshafenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 53 | 53 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 116 | SchwerteNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 52 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 117 | TauberbischofsheimBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 50 | 51 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 118 | VölklingenSaarland, Germany | 50 | 51 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 119 | RintelnLower Saxony, Germany | 49 | 50 | +0.2 µg/m³+2% |
| 120 | Neu-UlmBavaria, Germany | 53 | 54 | +0.1 µg/m³+1% |
| 121 | Biberach an der RißBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 51 | +0.1 µg/m³+1% |
| 122 | Lauda-KönigshofenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 51 | +0.1 µg/m³+1% |
| 123 | AachenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 47 | 48 | +0.1 µg/m³+1% |
The 109 cities that got cleaner, biggest fall first
| # | City | 2025 | 2026 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IngolstadtBavaria, Germany | 57 | 53 | −2.0 µg/m³−16% |
| 2 | NiederzierNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 51 | −1.7 µg/m³−16% |
| 3 | JülichNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 51 | −1.7 µg/m³−16% |
| 4 | MainzRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 55 | 52 | −1.7 µg/m³−15% |
| 5 | LüdenscheidNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 51 | 41 | −1.7 µg/m³−19% |
| 6 | BambergBavaria, Germany | 54 | 49 | −1.6 µg/m³−15% |
| 7 | Oettingen in BayernBavaria, Germany | 57 | 54 | −1.6 µg/m³−13% |
| 8 | ElsenfeldBavaria, Germany | 53 | 48 | −1.5 µg/m³−15% |
| 9 | GroßostheimBavaria, Germany | 53 | 48 | −1.5 µg/m³−15% |
| 10 | GießenHesse, Germany | 54 | 51 | −1.4 µg/m³−13% |
| 11 | MönchengladbachNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 51 | −1.4 µg/m³−13% |
| 12 | KrefeldNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 56 | 53 | −1.4 µg/m³−12% |
| 13 | WormsRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 57 | 54 | −1.4 µg/m³−11% |
| 14 | Ludwigshafen am RheinRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 57 | 55 | −1.4 µg/m³−11% |
| 15 | OberhausenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 56 | 53 | −1.4 µg/m³−12% |
| 16 | Bad FrankenhausenThuringia, Germany | 53 | 50 | −1.3 µg/m³−13% |
| 17 | WuppertalNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 53 | 51 | −1.3 µg/m³−13% |
| 18 | HattingenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 48 | −1.2 µg/m³−12% |
| 19 | Frankfurt am MainHesse, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.2 µg/m³−11% |
| 20 | DüsseldorfNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.2 µg/m³−11% |
| 21 | RatingenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 47 | −1.2 µg/m³−12% |
| 22 | HagenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 56 | 54 | −1.2 µg/m³−10% |
| 23 | TrierRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 53 | 51 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 24 | PulheimNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 48 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 25 | SinnersdorfNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 48 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 26 | KelsterbachHesse, Germany | 52 | 49 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 27 | HattersheimHesse, Germany | 52 | 49 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 28 | BonnNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 53 | 49 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 29 | Schwandorf in BayernBavaria, Germany | 53 | 51 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 30 | WeidenBavaria, Germany | 53 | 51 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 31 | KölnNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 53 | 51 | −1.1 µg/m³−11% |
| 32 | KaldenkirchenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.1 µg/m³−10% |
| 33 | NettetalNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.1 µg/m³−10% |
| 34 | AnsbachBavaria, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.1 µg/m³−10% |
| 35 | TraunreutBavaria, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.1 µg/m³−10% |
| 36 | ArzbergBavaria, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.0 µg/m³−10% |
| 37 | Trostberg an der AlzBavaria, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.0 µg/m³−10% |
| 38 | MarktredwitzBavaria, Germany | 54 | 52 | −1.0 µg/m³−10% |
| 39 | NurembergBavaria, Germany | 55 | 53 | −1.0 µg/m³−9% |
| 40 | KehlBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 55 | 53 | −0.9 µg/m³−8% |
| 41 | FlensburgSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 48 | 43 | −0.9 µg/m³−10% |
| 42 | SuhlThuringia, Germany | 48 | 43 | −0.9 µg/m³−10% |
| 43 | FilderstadtBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 53 | 51 | −0.9 µg/m³−9% |
| 44 | EssenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 55 | 53 | −0.9 µg/m³−8% |
| 45 | WetzlarHesse, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.8 µg/m³−8% |
| 46 | Bad KreuznachRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 56 | 55 | −0.8 µg/m³−7% |
| 47 | GersfeldHesse, Germany | 31 | 27 | −0.8 µg/m³−14% |
| 48 | BensheimHesse, Germany | 52 | 49 | −0.8 µg/m³−8% |
| 49 | AschaffenburgBavaria, Germany | 53 | 52 | −0.8 µg/m³−8% |
| 50 | BorkenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 52 | −0.8 µg/m³−8% |
| 51 | GelsenkirchenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 57 | 55 | −0.8 µg/m³−7% |
| 52 | LörrachBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 52 | 48 | −0.7 µg/m³−7% |
| 53 | Rüsselsheim am MainHesse, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.7 µg/m³−7% |
| 54 | DortmundNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 57 | 56 | −0.7 µg/m³−6% |
| 55 | Ludweiler-WarndtSaarland, Germany | 47 | 43 | −0.7 µg/m³−8% |
| 56 | WadgassenSaarland, Germany | 47 | 43 | −0.7 µg/m³−8% |
| 57 | DuisburgNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 55 | 53 | −0.7 µg/m³−6% |
| 58 | KasselHesse, Germany | 55 | 54 | −0.7 µg/m³−6% |
| 59 | BottropNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 56 | 54 | −0.7 µg/m³−6% |
| 60 | WiesbadenHesse, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.6 µg/m³−6% |
| 61 | Neuhaus am RennwegThuringia, Germany | 39 | 36 | −0.6 µg/m³−8% |
| 62 | Höhr-GrenzhausenRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 41 | 37 | −0.6 µg/m³−8% |
| 63 | BendorfRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 41 | 37 | −0.6 µg/m³−8% |
| 64 | SoestNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 49 | −0.6 µg/m³−6% |
| 65 | LeverkusenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 50 | −0.6 µg/m³−6% |
| 66 | Kempten (Allgäu)Bavaria, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.6 µg/m³−6% |
| 67 | StendalSaxony-Anhalt, Germany | 53 | 52 | −0.6 µg/m³−6% |
| 68 | StuttgartBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 55 | 54 | −0.6 µg/m³−5% |
| 69 | DattelnNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 55 | 54 | −0.6 µg/m³−5% |
| 70 | GärtringenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 47 | 44 | −0.5 µg/m³−6% |
| 71 | HerrenbergBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 47 | 44 | −0.5 µg/m³−6% |
| 72 | Hanau am MainHesse, Germany | 51 | 48 | −0.5 µg/m³−5% |
| 73 | RitterhudeLower Saxony, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.5 µg/m³−5% |
| 74 | WürzburgBavaria, Germany | 54 | 53 | −0.5 µg/m³−5% |
| 75 | MünsterNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 55 | 54 | −0.5 µg/m³−4% |
| 76 | GroßalmerodeHesse, Germany | 42 | 39 | −0.4 µg/m³−5% |
| 77 | WitzenhausenHesse, Germany | 42 | 39 | −0.4 µg/m³−5% |
| 78 | Limburg an der LahnHesse, Germany | 52 | 52 | −0.4 µg/m³−4% |
| 79 | KaiserslauternRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 53 | 52 | −0.4 µg/m³−4% |
| 80 | Schwäbisch HallBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 54 | 53 | −0.4 µg/m³−4% |
| 81 | BielefeldNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 54 | 53 | −0.4 µg/m³−4% |
| 82 | AugsburgBavaria, Germany | 54 | 54 | −0.4 µg/m³−4% |
| 83 | LampertheimHesse, Germany | 54 | 54 | −0.4 µg/m³−4% |
| 84 | MannheimBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 56 | 55 | −0.4 µg/m³−3% |
| 85 | SaarbrückenSaarland, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 86 | TitzNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 52 | 52 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 87 | WeselNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 53 | 52 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 88 | SulzbachHesse, Germany | 53 | 53 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 89 | EschbornHesse, Germany | 53 | 53 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 90 | DillingenSaarland, Germany | 54 | 53 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 91 | MunichBavaria, Germany | 54 | 54 | −0.3 µg/m³−3% |
| 92 | BraunlageLower Saxony, Germany | 32 | 31 | −0.3 µg/m³−5% |
| 93 | Waldfischbach-BurgalbenRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 37 | 36 | −0.3 µg/m³−4% |
| 94 | BebraHesse, Germany | 51 | 51 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 95 | FuldaHesse, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 96 | RiedstadtHesse, Germany | 48 | 47 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 97 | DarmstadtHesse, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 98 | KoblenzRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 53 | 52 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 99 | Neuenburg am RheinBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 53 | 53 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 100 | JüchenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany | 53 | 53 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 101 | SpeyerRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 58 | 57 | −0.2 µg/m³−2% |
| 102 | Königstein im TaunusHesse, Germany | 33 | 32 | −0.1 µg/m³−2% |
| 103 | ZierenbergHesse, Germany | 43 | 42 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
| 104 | KielSchleswig-Holstein, Germany | 44 | 43 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
| 105 | TrochtelfingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 39 | 39 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
| 106 | KonstanzBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 52 | 51 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
| 107 | BurghausenBavaria, Germany | 53 | 53 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
| 108 | GreizThuringia, Germany | 54 | 54 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
| 109 | HeilbronnBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 55 | 55 | −0.1 µg/m³−1% |
Means in US AQI over the days a city was measured in both years, the same calendar days each year; a city needs 55% of the days paired, and at least 30. The change is in µg/m³ and per cent. How we compare.
Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+
The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales
Updated 2026-10-07 12:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index.