SmogRank / South Korea / Jeollabuk-do / Namsa

Namsa, month by month

Namsa has a measured daily mean on 904 days since 23 March 2024. Its worst month was March 2026, at 85 US AQI (27.2 µg/m³), 351st of 2,971 cities on that month's world ranking. Its cleanest was September 2025, at 44 US AQI (7.9 µg/m³). 2025 averaged 63 US AQI (15.7 µg/m³), against 62 US AQI (15.2 µg/m³) in 2024.

Every month since 2024

202666 so far257 days measured449th of 2,791 in the world
202462 for the year282 days measured246th of 2,097 in the world
Each square is a month's mean PM2.5 in US AQI from Namsa's measured days, with its place on that month's world ranking under it. A month has a mean once 70% of its days are measured, the rule the monthly rankings use; under that, the square gives the days measured. Each square opens that month's ranking with Namsa marked; each year, the year's. A dashed square is the running month, so far.
Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Months without a mean, and why

2 months
MonthWhy
Aug 202621 of 31 days measured; a month needs 22. The others: 10 with under 18 hours of readings or readings that failed our checks.
Mar 20249 of 31 days measured; a month needs 22.

A day counts once 18 hours of it are measured; a month needs 70% of its days.

Namsa's worst months

MonthUS AQIDays measuredWorld rankEpisode
March 2026 8527.2 µg/m³31 of 31351stof 2,971South Korea, 15 to 18 March 2026
South Korea, 9 to 12 March 2026
February 2026 7924.3 µg/m³28 of 28404thof 2,866South Korea and Japan, 10 to 15 February 2026
South Korea, February 2026
March 2025 7823.4 µg/m³31 of 31457thof 2,862–
January 2025 7421.6 µg/m³31 of 31252ndof 2,474Japan and South Korea, 17 to 24 January 2025
April 2024 7421.4 µg/m³28 of 30189thof 2,520Japan and South Korea, April 2024
South Korea, 6 to 9 April 2024
April 2026 7220.3 µg/m³29 of 30404thof 2,941–

Monthly means over the days measured; finished months only. World rank: its place on that month's world ranking of every city with enough days. Each month opens that ranking.

Namsa's worst days

DayUS AQIEpisode
21 Jan 2025 15967.6 µg/m³Japan and South Korea, 17 to 24 January 2025
22 Jan 2025 15358.3 µg/m³Japan and South Korea, 17 to 24 January 2025
15 Jan 2026 14653.9 µg/m³South Korea and Japan, January 2026
13 Feb 2026 14352.4 µg/m³South Korea and Japan, 10 to 15 February 2026
14 Feb 2026 13248.2 µg/m³South Korea and Japan, 10 to 15 February 2026
7 Dec 2025 12846.4 µg/m³South Korea, 7 December 2025
25 Mar 2025 12846.3 µg/m³–
5 Feb 2026 12545.1 µg/m³South Korea, February 2026
23 Mar 2025 12444.9 µg/m³–
12 Feb 2026 12444.8 µg/m³South Korea and Japan, 10 to 15 February 2026

Daily means, the highest since 23 Mar 2024; the WHO's daily guideline is 15 µg/m³. Each date opens that day's world ranking, and each episode the bad-air spell it was part of.

Use this history

SmogRank, PM2.5 monthly and daily means, Namsa, South Korea, 23 Mar 2024 – 12 Oct 2026. Monitor data from Korea Air Ministry of Environment via OpenAQ; sources listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/kr/namsa/history (accessed 12 Oct 2026).

Download chart (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Namsa now: the last 24 hours, its ranks today and the last 12 months day by day.

Updated 2026-10-12 20:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published (why we use them).