SmogRank / Rankings

516 cities by checked peak, last 7 days

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (310 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

Ranked by checked peak: each city's worst 6 hours in a row, read by at least 2 monitoring places 3 km or more apart (the second-highest place's average over those hours), so one faulty monitor or smoke over one corner of a city can't set it. 516 of these 2,895 cities are ranked: those measured at 2 or more such places on enough of the days.

  1. =101NeiliTaiwan, Taiwan 93
  2. =101PoznańGreater Poland, Poland 93
  3. 103BangkokBangkok, Thailand 92
  4. 104SintansinDaejeon, South Korea 92
  5. 105SantiagoSantiago Metropolitan, Chile 92
  6. =106JeonjuJeollabuk-do, South Korea 91
  7. =106Lak SiBangkok, Thailand 91
  8. 108Bang PakongChachoengsao, Thailand 91
  9. 109GentFlanders, Belgium 91
  10. 110BelgradeCentral Serbia, Serbia 90
  11. 111DunkirkHauts-de-France, France 90
  12. 112WarsawMazovia, Poland 90
  13. =113Chinch'ŏnNorth Chungcheong, South Korea 90
  14. =113WrocławLower Silesia, Poland 90
  15. 115Icheon-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea 89
  16. 116GdańskPomerania, Poland 88
  17. 117TainanTaiwan, Taiwan 88
  18. =118KathmanduBagmati Province, Nepal 88
  19. =118KaohsiungTakao, Taiwan 88
  20. 120MiddelburgMpumalanga, South Africa 87
  21. =121GongjuChungcheongnam-do, South Korea 87
  22. =121BredaNorth Brabant, The Netherlands 87
  23. 123LondonEngland, United Kingdom 87
  24. 124FresnoCalifornia, United States 87
  25. 125HanamGyeonggi-do, South Korea 87
  26. 126NitraNitra Region, Slovakia 86
  27. =127Ban Khlong PrawetBangkok, Thailand 86
  28. =127WŏnjuGangwon-do, South Korea 86
  29. 129NaplesCampania, Italy 85
  30. 130Ústí nad LabemÚstí nad Labem Region, Czechia 85
  31. 131MexicaliBaja California, Mexico 85
  32. 132Puerto MonttLos Lagos Region, Chile 85
  33. 133Taesal-liChungcheongnam-do, South Korea 84
  34. 134Nong KhaemBangkok, Thailand 84
  35. 135MasanGwangju, South Korea 83
  36. =136MuanJeollanam-do, South Korea 83
  37. =136GwangjuGyeonggi-do, South Korea 83
  38. 138Berlinlast full day 11 OctState of Berlin, Germany 83
  39. 139San Pedro SulaCortés Department, Honduras 82
  40. 140SuncheonJeollanam-do, South Korea 82
  41. =141ImsilJeollabuk-do, South Korea 82
  42. =141CharleroiWallonia, Belgium 82
  43. =143KwangyangJeollanam-do, South Korea 81
  44. =143KoesanNorth Chungcheong, South Korea 81
  45. =143PueblaPuebla, Mexico 81
  46. 146KosaiShizuoka, Japan 81
  47. =147YeosuJeollanam-do, South Korea 81
  48. =147TalcaMaule Region, Chile 81
  49. 149Cremonalast full day 11 OctLombardy, Italy 80
  50. 150HumennéPrešov Region, Slovakia 80
  51. 151AntwerpFlanders, Belgium 80
  52. =152HayangGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea 79
  53. =152MelseleFlanders, Belgium 79
  54. =154Gyeongsan-siGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea 79
  55. =154Barra da TijucaRio de Janeiro, Brazil 79
  56. =156OkazakiAichi, Japan 79
  57. =156Duque de CaxiasRio de Janeiro, Brazil 79
  58. 158Los ÁngelesBiobio, Chile 79
  59. =159RayongRayong, Thailand 78
  60. =159Mueang NonthaburiNonthaburi, Thailand 78
  61. =159ChungjuNorth Chungcheong, South Korea 78
  62. 162Bernau bei BerlinBrandenburg, Germany 78
  63. =163StabroekFlanders, Belgium 77
  64. =163Sai MaiBangkok, Thailand 77
  65. =165DaeguDaegu, South Korea 77
  66. =165HoustonTexas, United States 77
  67. 167LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia 77
  68. =168SydneyNew South Wales, Australia 77
  69. =168Saint-LouisSaint-Louis, Senegal 77
  70. 170GumiGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea 76
  71. =171KariyaAichi, Japan 76
  72. =171West MifflinPennsylvania, United States 76
  73. =171NisshinAichi, Japan 76
  74. =174ToyotaAichi, Japan 76
  75. =174ToyohashiAichi, Japan 76
  76. 176ChangwonGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea 76
  77. =177NamyangjuGyeonggi-do, South Korea 75
  78. =177FreetownWestern Area, Sierra Leone 75
  79. =177BeverenFlanders, Belgium 75
  80. =180Rio de JaneiroRio de Janeiro, Brazil 75
  81. =180GuadalajaraJalisco, Mexico 75
  82. =182CoronelBiobio, Chile 75
  83. =182TōkaiAichi, Japan 75
  84. 184BiałystokPodlasie, Poland 74
  85. =185Little RockArkansas, United States 74
  86. =185AtlantaGeorgia, United States 74
  87. =185Wake ForestNorth Carolina, United States 74
  88. 188NagoyaAichi, Japan 74
  89. 189Milanlast full day 11 OctLombardy, Italy 74
  90. 190GifuGifu, Japan 73
  91. 191TalcahuanoBiobio, Chile 73
  92. 192IndianapolisIndiana, United States 72
  93. =193KurashikiOkayama, Japan 72
  94. =193ZaanstadNorth Holland, The Netherlands 72
  95. =195Donghae CityGangwon-do, South Korea 72
  96. =195BrnoSouth Moravian, Czechia 72
  97. 197LewistonIdaho, United States 72
  98. 198GroningenGroningen, The Netherlands 71
  99. 199KofuYamanashi, Japan 71
  100. 200Jordan SpringsNew South Wales, Australia 71

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by checked peak PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 7 days to 14 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC: each city's worst 6 hours in a row, read by 2 or more monitoring places 3 km or more apart, cities with a checked peak on 5 or more of the 7 days. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=7d&by=peak. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Burunday, #2 Faisalabad, #3 Otegen Batyra, #4 Multan, #6 Peshawar, #7 Lahore, #8 Gujranwala, #9 Dhaka and #10 Kinshasa. Some readings from Aurassure; Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 by average (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 07:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some readings: Aurassure; Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published (why we use them).