SmogRank / Rankings

516 cities by checked peak, last 7 days

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (310 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

Ranked by checked peak: each city's worst 6 hours in a row, read by at least 2 monitoring places 3 km or more apart (the second-highest place's average over those hours), so one faulty monitor or smoke over one corner of a city can't set it. 516 of these 2,895 cities are ranked: those measured at 2 or more such places on enough of the days.

  1. =301GijangBusan, South Korea 62
  2. =301GaigeturiJeju-do, South Korea 62
  3. =301ShizuokaShizuoka, Japan 62
  4. =301SabaeFukui, Japan 62
  5. =301KasukabeSaitama, Japan 62
  6. 306KurihamaKanagawa, Japan 61
  7. =307SheffieldEngland, United Kingdom 61
  8. =307JōyōKyoto, Japan 61
  9. =309MinatoWakayama, Japan 61
  10. =309HimejiHyōgo, Japan 61
  11. =309ToppenishWashington, United States 61
  12. =312TakamatsuKagawa, Japan 61
  13. =312SandachōHyōgo, Japan 61
  14. =312HigashinozoeHyōgo, Japan 61
  15. =312MiyakonojōMiyazaki, Japan 61
  16. =312FujiedaShizuoka, Japan 61
  17. =312SalzburgSalzburg, Austria 61
  18. =312ParisÎle-de-France, France 61
  19. =319UbeYamaguchi, Japan 61
  20. =319KobeHyōgo, Japan 61
  21. =319KawagoeSaitama, Japan 61
  22. =319KanbaraShizuoka, Japan 61
  23. =319YakimaWashington, United States 61
  24. =324Kitakyushulast full day 11 OctFukuoka, Japan 61
  25. =324HirakataOsaka, Japan 61
  26. =324TorontoOntario, Canada 61
  27. =327Chiang MaiChiang Mai, Thailand 60
  28. =327EvanstonIllinois, United States 60
  29. =329SapporoHokkaido, Japan 60
  30. =329MelbourneVictoria, Australia 60
  31. =329TimaruCanterbury, New Zealand 60
  32. =329AzaminoKanagawa, Japan 60
  33. =333SinhyeonGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea 60
  34. =333YamagataYamagata, Japan 60
  35. =335SakaiOsaka, Japan 60
  36. =335KashiwaChiba, Japan 60
  37. =335MatsuyamaEhime, Japan 60
  38. =335NiceProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 60
  39. =335NoboritoKanagawa, Japan 60
  40. 340BrusselsBrussels Capital, Belgium 59
  41. =341HadanoKanagawa, Japan 59
  42. =341MagnaUtah, United States 59
  43. =341YamatoKanagawa, Japan 59
  44. =344PortlandOregon, United States 59
  45. =344BothellWashington, United States 59
  46. =346GyeongjuGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea 59
  47. =346SodegauraChiba, Japan 59
  48. =348AkashiHyōgo, Japan 59
  49. =348OgawamachiSaitama, Japan 59
  50. =348MachidaTokyo, Japan 59
  51. =348FujisawaKanagawa, Japan 59
  52. =348KōriyamaFukushima, Japan 59
  53. =348RouenNormandy, France 59
  54. =348WashingtonDistrict of Columbia, United States 59
  55. =348ShūnanYamaguchi, Japan 59
  56. 356Celayalast full day 11 OctGuanajuato, Mexico 58
  57. 357Palo AltoCalifornia, United States 58
  58. =358OlpeNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 58
  59. =358BilbaoBasque Country, Spain 58
  60. =358CincinnatiOhio, United States 58
  61. =361KyotoKyoto, Japan 58
  62. =361IchiharaChiba, Japan 58
  63. =361HakodateHokkaido, Japan 58
  64. =361DunedinOtago, New Zealand 58
  65. =365UrayasuChiba, Japan 58
  66. =365Tagajō-shiMiyagi, Japan 58
  67. =365SendaiMiyagi, Japan 58
  68. =368NewcastleNew South Wales, Australia 58
  69. =368ColumbusOhio, United States 58
  70. =370KainanWakayama, Japan 57
  71. =370SakuraChiba, Japan 57
  72. =370NottinghamEngland, United Kingdom 57
  73. =370MorrisvilleNorth Carolina, United States 57
  74. =370SennanOsaka, Japan 57
  75. =375ChibaChiba, Japan 57
  76. =375GladstoneQueensland, Australia 57
  77. =375KnoxvilleTennessee, United States 57
  78. =375PhoenixArizona, United States 57
  79. =379TondabayashichōOsaka, Japan 57
  80. =379NiigataNiigata, Japan 57
  81. =379NagasakiNagasaki, Japan 57
  82. =379TomakomaiHokkaido, Japan 57
  83. =379NewarkDelaware, United States 57
  84. =379San JoseCalifornia, United States 57
  85. =379CalgaryAlberta, Canada 57
  86. =386TakarazukaHyōgo, Japan 57
  87. =386ValenciaValencia, Spain 57
  88. =386LyonAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 57
  89. =386Mango HillQueensland, Australia 57
  90. =390TokushimaTokushima, Japan 56
  91. =390KanazawaIshikawa, Japan 56
  92. =390IwakiFukushima, Japan 56
  93. =390MiddlesbroughEngland, United Kingdom 56
  94. 394Frankfurt am MainHesse, Germany 56
  95. =395OyamaTochigi, Japan 56
  96. =395MatsudoChiba, Japan 56
  97. =395TorideIbaraki, Japan 56
  98. =395CharlotteNorth Carolina, United States 56
  99. =395AbingtonPennsylvania, United States 56
  100. =395EugeneOregon, United States 56

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by checked peak PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 7 days to 14 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC: each city's worst 6 hours in a row, read by 2 or more monitoring places 3 km or more apart, cities with a checked peak on 5 or more of the 7 days. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=7d&by=peak. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Burunday, #2 Faisalabad, #3 Otegen Batyra, #4 Multan, #6 Peshawar, #7 Lahore, #8 Gujranwala, #9 Dhaka and #10 Kinshasa. Some readings from Aurassure; Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 by average (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 07:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some readings: Aurassure; Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published (why we use them).