SmogRank / Rankings

All 2,645 cities by PM2.5, last 24 hours

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities are missing from this board, not clean.

Hide the 1,153 cities with only 1–2 sensors

These cities have only one or two low-cost sensors, and one cheap unit can read well off, so they take no rank. They sit at their place by value, marked –, and every ranked city keeps its number.

  1. not rankedSzigetszentmiklósPest County, Hungary 45 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  2. not rankedAlexandriaVirginia, United States 45 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  3. =1099ŁomiankiMazovia, Poland 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  4. =1099UlmBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲566
  5. =1099GießenHesse, Germany 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲199
  6. =1099EsztergomKomárom-Esztergom, Hungary 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼43
  7. =1099SlatinaSouth Moravian, Czechia 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼298
  8. =1099LjubljanaLjubljana, Slovenia 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲783
  9. =1099HernandoMississippi, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼143
  10. =1099DentOhio, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲154
  11. =1099CookevilleTennessee, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲279
  12. =1099HendersonvilleTennessee, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲192
  13. =1099Fort LeeNew Jersey, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  14. =1099JohnstownPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲894
  15. =1099Alta SierraCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼313
  16. =1099AnaheimCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲422
  17. =1099Long BeachCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲474
  18. =1099EurekaCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼502
  19. =1099SodegauraChiba, Japan 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲230
  20. not rankedUithoornNorth Holland, The Netherlands 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  21. not rankedRibnitz-DamgartenMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  22. not rankedSarregueminesGrand Est, France 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  23. not rankedOpavaMoravian-Silesian Region, Czechia 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  24. not rankedRiehenBasel-City, Switzerland 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  25. not rankedLandoverMaryland, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  26. not rankedMaldenMassachusetts, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  27. =1116ToyonakaOsaka, Japan 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲236
  28. =1116ImaichiTochigi, Japan 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼66
  29. =1116HeilbronnBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲325
  30. =1116AhausNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  31. =1116GalwayConnacht, Ireland 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1072
  32. =1116Fontaine-lès-DijonBourgogne-Franche-Comté, France 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲311
  33. =1116CherbourgNormandy, France 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1283
  34. =1116NitraNitra Region, Slovakia 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲376
  35. =1116PaulíniaSão Paulo, Brazil 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼209
  36. =1116DecaturIllinois, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼342
  37. =1116East Saint LouisIllinois, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼194
  38. =1116MonroeLouisiana, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼86
  39. =1116DurhamNorth Carolina, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1258
  40. =1116LebanonOhio, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲96
  41. =1116PhiladelphiaPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1342
  42. =1116Saint AndrewsSouth Carolina, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲872
  43. =1116SalemVirginia, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1526
  44. =1116Mission ViejoCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲478
  45. =1116St. CatharinesOntario, Canada 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲341
  46. not rankedCape CoastCentral, Ghana 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  47. not rankedHavertownPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  48. =1135HumennéPrešov Region, Slovakia 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲368
  49. =1135NorthamptonEngland, United Kingdom 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  50. =1135Marburg an der LahnHesse, Germany 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲329
  51. =1135Limburg an der LahnHesse, Germany 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲235
  52. =1135Frankfurt am MainHesse, Germany 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲179
  53. =1135MarseilleProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲276
  54. =1135Frýdek-MístekMoravian-Silesian Region, Czechia 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼588
  55. =1135OmegnaPiedmont, Italy 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲84
  56. =1135São PauloSão Paulo, Brazil 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲132
  57. =1135Ciudad JuárezChihuahua, Mexico 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼41
  58. =1135Bonita SpringsFlorida, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲117
  59. =1135LexingtonNorth Carolina, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1322
  60. =1135HighlandsTexas, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼212
  61. =1135Wells BranchTexas, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲187
  62. =1135BrocktonMassachusetts, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1267
  63. =1135BridgevillePennsylvania, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1028
  64. =1135WyomissingPennsylvania, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1199
  65. =1135Weirton HeightsWest Virginia, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲980
  66. =1135Redwood CityCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼154
  67. =1135Minami-AlpsYamanashi, Japan 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼684
  68. not rankedAbovyanKotayk, Armenia 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  69. not rankedBad Neuenahr-AhrweilerRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  70. not rankedCastelfranco EmiliaEmilia-Romagna, Italy 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  71. not rankedTegucigalpaFrancisco Morazán Department, Honduras 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  72. not rankedNew LenoxIllinois, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  73. not rankedGardenaCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  74. =1155BlackpoolEngland, United Kingdom 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲996
  75. =1155DoetinchemGelderland, The Netherlands 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲201
  76. =1155SchwazTyrol, Austria 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲600
  77. =1155LongfordLeinster, Ireland 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1195
  78. =1155LyonAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲433
  79. =1155GdańskPomerania, Poland 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲982
  80. =1155Kendale LakesFlorida, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼21
  81. =1155BaltimoreMaryland, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1171
  82. =1155MurraysvilleNorth Carolina, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼124
  83. =1155RoanokeVirginia, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1479
  84. =1155WaterlooIowa, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼121
  85. =1155EwingNew Jersey, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  86. =1155State CollegePennsylvania, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1098
  87. =1155San LeandroCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼421
  88. =1155PortlandOregon, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲84
  89. =1155RentonWashington, United States 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲102
  90. not rankedPlevenPleven, Bulgaria 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  91. not rankedNova PazovaVojvodina, Serbia 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  92. not rankedBoomFlanders, Belgium 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  93. not rankedBerkel en RodenrijsSouth Holland, The Netherlands 43 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  94. =1171KochaniKochani, North Macedonia 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1004
  95. =1171YonezawaYamagata, Japan 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼414
  96. =1171SendaiMiyagi, Japan 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼202
  97. =1171PlymouthEngland, United Kingdom 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲699
  98. =1171PayerneVaud, Switzerland 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲215
  99. =1171RothBavaria, Germany 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  100. =1171NancyGrand Est, France 42 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲95

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors 1–2 sensors, not ranked About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 24 hours to 14 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC: each city's mean of its hourly values, cities measured in 18 or more of the 24 hours. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Gaur, Madhesh, #2 Kuala Lumpur, #4 Multan, #5 Faisalabad, #6 Gujranwala, #7 Lilongwe, #8 Lahore, #9 Dhaka and #10 Bahawalpur. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 05:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).