SmogRank / Rankings

All 2,645 cities by PM2.5, last 24 hours

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities are missing from this board, not clean.

Hide the 1,153 cities with only 1–2 sensors

These cities have only one or two low-cost sensors, and one cheap unit can read well off, so they take no rank. They sit at their place by value, marked –, and every ranked city keeps its number.

  1. not rankedSão LeopoldoRio Grande do Sul, Brazil 40 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  2. not rankedCampo BomRio Grande do Sul, Brazil 40 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  3. not rankedThe Trails of FriscoTexas, United States 40 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  4. =1259KrasnodarKrasnodar Krai, Russia 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼582
  5. =1259RuseRuse, Bulgaria 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼77
  6. =1259GiubiascoTicino, Switzerland 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲321
  7. =1259Heidenheim an der BrenzBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼152
  8. =1259WaterfordMunster, Ireland 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲278
  9. =1259HaguenauGrand Est, France 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲303
  10. =1259AlbertvilleAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲282
  11. =1259BrnoSouth Moravian, Czechia 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲158
  12. =1259BorgomaneroPiedmont, Italy 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲83
  13. =1259Zagorje ob SaviMunicipality of Zagorje ob Savi, Slovenia 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲359
  14. =1259TampaFlorida, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼39
  15. =1259FayettevilleNorth Carolina, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲933
  16. =1259BloomingtonIllinois, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼298
  17. =1259LynnMassachusetts, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1312
  18. =1259LincolnNebraska, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲291
  19. =1259BethlehemPennsylvania, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1255
  20. =1259ArvadaColorado, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1100
  21. =1259BremertonWashington, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲43
  22. not rankedBan KamalaPhuket, Thailand 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  23. not rankedKamienna GóraLower Silesia, Poland 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  24. not rankedWestonFlorida, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  25. not rankedNiagara FallsNew York, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  26. =1277KofuYamanashi, Japan 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼659
  27. =1277IwataShizuoka, Japan 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼384
  28. =1277Sankt PöltenLower Austria, Austria 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲306
  29. =1277PerchtoldsdorfLower Austria, Austria 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲330
  30. =1277LeibnitzStyria, Austria 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲257
  31. =1277KlosterneuburgLower Austria, Austria 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲359
  32. =1277JenbachTyrol, Austria 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲384
  33. =1277ThionvilleGrand Est, France 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼147
  34. =1277BelfortBourgogne-Franche-Comté, France 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼71
  35. =1277BudapestBudapest, Hungary 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲945
  36. =1277SenicaTrnava Region, Slovakia 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲265
  37. =1277SopotPomerania, Poland 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1001
  38. =1277Santo AndréSão Paulo, Brazil 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲770
  39. =1277FrostburgMaryland, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1050
  40. =1277McAlesterOklahoma, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲292
  41. =1277CharlottesvilleVirginia, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1234
  42. =1277RedfordMichigan, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼138
  43. =1277PortervilleCalifornia, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼102
  44. =1277Thousand OaksCalifornia, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲24
  45. =1277Yuba CityCalifornia, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼489
  46. =1277NanaimoBritish Columbia, Canada 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲983
  47. not rankedStróvolosNicosia, Cyprus 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  48. not rankedGalaţiGalați County, Romania 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  49. not rankedPodunajské BiskupiceBratislava Region, Slovakia 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  50. not rankedRacineWisconsin, United States 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  51. not rankedQuinte WestOntario, Canada 39 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  52. =1298SvishtovVeliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲415
  53. =1298SakaiminatoTottori, Japan 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲303
  54. =1298YamagataYamagata, Japan 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼692
  55. =1298BournemouthEngland, United Kingdom 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1301
  56. =1298SteyrUpper Austria, Austria 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲774
  57. =1298Groß-EnzersdorfLower Austria, Austria 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲487
  58. =1298WertheimBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲237
  59. =1298LudwigsburgBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲395
  60. =1298ErlangenBavaria, Germany 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲919
  61. =1298La GardeProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲114
  62. =1298FréjusProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲316
  63. =1298KroměřížZlín, Czechia 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲318
  64. =1298BogatyniaLower Silesia, Poland 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲470
  65. =1298ComoLombardy, Italy 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲319
  66. =1298BearDelaware, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1186
  67. =1298WichitaKansas, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼76
  68. =1298MooreOklahoma, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲403
  69. =1298Kennett SquarePennsylvania, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1135
  70. =1298ChampaignIllinois, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼182
  71. =1298Aizu-WakamatsuFukushima, Japan 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼643
  72. not rankedKropyvnytskyiKirovohrad, Ukraine 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  73. not rankedKruševacCentral Serbia, Serbia 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  74. not rankedBikinKhabarovsk, Russia 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  75. not rankedShenyangLiaoning, China 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  76. not rankedRabatRabat-Salé-Kénitra, Morocco 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  77. not rankedHerbornHesse, Germany 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  78. not rankedFreisingBavaria, Germany no daily values yet38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  79. not rankedParklandFlorida, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  80. not rankedDowners GroveIllinois, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  81. =1318Port ShepstoneKwaZulu-Natal, South Africa 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼1109
  82. =1318KōzakiChiba, Japan 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼152
  83. =1318HitachiIbaraki, Japan 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼9
  84. =1318KushiroHokkaido, Japan 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼494
  85. =1318LondonEngland, United Kingdom 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲752
  86. =1318ViennaVienna, Austria 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲525
  87. =1318ReinheimHesse, Germany 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲528
  88. =1318DarmstadtHesse, Germany 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲530
  89. =1318LuxembourgLuxembourg, Luxembourg 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲70
  90. =1318NavanLeinster, Ireland 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲981
  91. =1318QuimperBrittany, France 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1243
  92. =1318VeszprémVeszprém, Hungary 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲110
  93. =1318PaducahKentucky, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼434
  94. =1318ShreveportLouisiana, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼222
  95. =1318SpringfieldVirginia, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲1206
  96. =1318PawtucketRhode Island, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲508
  97. =1318Green BayWisconsin, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼555
  98. =1318LivermoreCalifornia, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline
  99. =1318Los AngelesCalifornia, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▲485
  100. =1318Four CornersFlorida, United States 38 US AQI0.5 times the WHO guideline▼276

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors 1–2 sensors, not ranked About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 24 hours to 14 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC: each city's mean of its hourly values, cities measured in 18 or more of the 24 hours. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Gaur, Madhesh, #2 Kuala Lumpur, #4 Multan, #5 Faisalabad, #6 Gujranwala, #7 Lilongwe, #8 Lahore, #9 Dhaka and #10 Bahawalpur. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 05:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).