SmogRank / Rankings

All 2,645 cities by PM2.5, last 24 hours

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities are missing from this board, not clean.

Hide the 1,153 cities with only 1–2 sensors

These cities have only one or two low-cost sensors, and one cheap unit can read well off, so they take no rank. They sit at their place by value, marked –, and every ranked city keeps its number.

  1. not rankedRickmansworthEngland, United Kingdom 8 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  2. not rankedDidcotEngland, United Kingdom 8 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  3. not rankedSierreValais, Switzerland 8 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  4. not rankedWittenheimGrand Est, France 8 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  5. not rankedEastonMassachusetts, United States 8 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  6. not rankedGilbertArizona, United States no daily values yet8 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  7. =2619Stara ZagoraStara Zagora, Bulgaria 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼88
  8. =2619KazanlakStara Zagora, Bulgaria 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼553
  9. =2619DuluthMinnesota, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼74
  10. =2619AberdeenSouth Dakota, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  11. =2619DeltaColorado, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼178
  12. =2619Rouyn-NorandaQuebec, Canada 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲37
  13. not rankedPeterleeEngland, United Kingdom 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  14. not rankedEmmendingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  15. not rankedOakvilleMissouri, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  16. 2625RooseveltUtah, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲34
  17. not rankedNéa ErythraíaAttica, Greece 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  18. not rankedNoginskMoscow Oblast, Russia 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  19. not rankedGioia TauroCalabria, Italy 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  20. not rankedSaleEngland, United Kingdom 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  21. not rankedMarket HarboroughEngland, United Kingdom 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  22. not rankedAshfordEngland, United Kingdom 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  23. not rankedSavigny-sur-OrgeÎle-de-France, France 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  24. not rankedLillestrømAkershus, Norway 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  25. not rankedCesenaEmilia-Romagna, Italy 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  26. not rankedMarlboroughMassachusetts, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  27. not rankedWest AlbanyNew York, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  28. not rankedValenciaCalifornia, United States 7 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  29. =2626Casas AdobesArizona, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼248
  30. =2626EnochUtah, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲26
  31. =2626OremUtah, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲1
  32. =2626Spanish ForkUtah, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼135
  33. =2626DrummondvilleQuebec, Canada 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼421
  34. not rankedTomskTomsk Oblast, Russia 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  35. not rankedRoystonEngland, United Kingdom 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  36. not rankedOswestryEngland, United Kingdom 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  37. not rankedPesaroThe Marches, Italy 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  38. not rankedMerrimackNew Hampshire, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  39. not rankedGatineauQuebec, Canada 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  40. =2631DronfieldEngland, United Kingdom 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼504
  41. =2631GersfeldHesse, Germany 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼317
  42. =2631PriceUtah, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲40
  43. =2631CheneyWashington, United States 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲53
  44. =2631SherbrookeQuebec, Canada 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼509
  45. not rankedJakobsbergStockholm, Sweden 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  46. not rankedStarnbergBavaria, Germany 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  47. not rankedMontreuilÎle-de-France, France 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  48. not rankedBeloeilQuebec, Canada 6 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  49. =2636CloquetMinnesota, United States 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼149
  50. =2636AspenColorado, United States 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼61
  51. =2636North BayOntario, Canada 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼252
  52. not rankedAbakanKhakasiya Republic, Russia 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  53. not rankedAvonÎle-de-France, France 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  54. not rankedCatacamasOlancho Department, Honduras no daily values yet5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  55. not rankedLa PazLa Paz Department, Bolivia 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  56. not rankedSudburyMassachusetts, United States 5 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  57. 2639Heber CityUtah, United States 4 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▲38
  58. not rankedFalconara MarittimaThe Marches, Italy 4 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  59. not rankedEaganMinnesota, United States 4 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  60. not rankedPomonaCalifornia, United States 4 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  61. =2640LaconiaNew Hampshire, United States 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline▼68
  62. =2640YellowknifeNorthwest Territories, Canada 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline▼3
  63. not rankedNorthallertonEngland, United Kingdom 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  64. not rankedMontereau-Fault-YonneÎle-de-France, France 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  65. not rankedSpringTexas, United States 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  66. not rankedRosemountMinnesota, United States 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  67. not rankedSanta FeNew Mexico, United States 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  68. not rankedJuneauAlaska, United States 4 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  69. =2642West FargoNorth Dakota, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline▼33
  70. =2642Sweet HomeOregon, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline▲30
  71. not rankedLanakenFlanders, Belgium 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  72. not rankedNorth StamfordConnecticut, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  73. not rankedRed WingMinnesota, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  74. not rankedWinnipegManitoba, Canada 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  75. not rankedLos Llanos de AridaneCanary Islands, Spain 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  76. not rankedWoodburyMinnesota, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  77. not rankedEau ClaireWisconsin, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  78. not rankedFlorenceArizona, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  79. not rankedMontclairCalifornia, United States 3 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  80. not rankedConcordNew Hampshire, United States 2 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  81. not rankedDoverNew Hampshire, United States 2 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  82. not rankedKanataOntario, Canada 2 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  83. not rankedWest KelownaBritish Columbia, Canada 2 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  84. not rankedSuttonEngland, United Kingdom 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  85. not rankedBrushy CreekTexas, United States 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  86. not rankedSun ValleyNevada, United States 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  87. not rankedSaint-EustacheQuebec, Canada 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  88. not rankedLes UlisÎle-de-France, France 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  89. 2644Swan HillVictoria, Australia 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline▲41
  90. not rankedStowmarketEngland, United Kingdom 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  91. not rankedRipleyEngland, United Kingdom 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  92. not rankedConcepciónConcepción, Paraguay 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  93. not rankedSaint-LazareQuebec, Canada 1 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  94. 2645LongyearbyenSvalbard, Svalbard and Jan Mayen 0 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  95. not rankedKarlskogaÖrebro, Sweden 0 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  96. not rankedBrooklyn CenterMinnesota, United States 0 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  97. not rankedRosevilleMinnesota, United States 0 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline
  98. not rankedVenturaCalifornia, United States 0 US AQI0.0 times the WHO guideline

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors 1–2 sensors, not ranked About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 24 hours to 14 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC: each city's mean of its hourly values, cities measured in 18 or more of the 24 hours. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Gaur, Madhesh, #2 Kuala Lumpur, #4 Multan, #5 Faisalabad, #6 Gujranwala, #7 Lilongwe, #8 Lahore, #9 Dhaka and #10 Bahawalpur. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 05:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).