SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =999FukuokaFukuoka, Japan 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼113
  2. =999LinzUpper Austria, Austria 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼89
  3. =999Deuchendorflast full day 24 SeptStyria, Austria 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼111
  4. =999MeulebekeFlanders, Belgium 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼125
  5. =999Stendallast full day 10 OctSaxony-Anhalt, Germany 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼220
  6. =999Merseburglast full day 10 OctSaxony-Anhalt, Germany 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼219
  7. =999Halberstadtlast full day 10 OctSaxony-Anhalt, Germany 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼203
  8. =999WheelersburgOhio, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼119
  9. =999DetroitMichigan, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼118
  10. =999ClevelandOhio, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼117
  11. =999La GrandeOregon, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼136
  12. =999WindsorOntario, Canada 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼116
  13. =999HigashihiroshimaHiroshima, Japan 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼115
  14. =1014SuwałkiPodlasie, Poland 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼398
  15. =1014TakamatsuKagawa, Japan 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼129
  16. =1014PotsdamBrandenburg, Germany 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼148
  17. =1014Bad Kreuznachlast full day 10 OctRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  18. =1014NiceProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼121
  19. =1014MariborUrban Municipality of Maribor, Slovenia 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▲54
  20. =1014PiracicabaSão Paulo, Brazil 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼120
  21. =1014BauruSão Paulo, Brazil 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼135
  22. =1014MarionArkansas, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼119
  23. =1014SpartanburgSouth Carolina, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼118
  24. =1014LancasterPennsylvania, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼117
  25. =1014Great FallsMontana, United States 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼115
  26. =1014HyūgaMiyazaki, Japan 54 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼113
  27. =1027Tottori-shiTottori, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼125
  28. =1027TakanabeMiyazaki, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼124
  29. =1027TaharaAichi, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼123
  30. =1027Kakogawachō-honmachiHyōgo, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼122
  31. =1027ImabariEhime, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼120
  32. =1027TimaruCanterbury, New Zealand 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼140
  33. =1027HuelvaAndalusia, Spain 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  34. =1027GħarbL-Għarb, Malta 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼154
  35. =1027NorthamptonEngland, United Kingdom 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  36. =1027BasildonEngland, United Kingdom 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  37. =1027TullnLower Austria, Austria 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼100
  38. =1027Altenburglast full day 10 OctThuringia, Germany 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼170
  39. =1027RoubaixHauts-de-France, France 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼150
  40. =1027RokycanyPlzeň Region, Czechia 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  41. =1027HoustonTexas, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼108
  42. =1027San AntonioTexas, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼107
  43. =1027WestervilleOhio, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼106
  44. =1027South Lake TahoeCalifornia, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼129
  45. =1027MadrasOregon, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼105
  46. =1046TomiokaKumamoto, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼122
  47. =1046KasaokaOkayama, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼121
  48. =1046HigashiosakaOsaka, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼120
  49. =1046HayashimaOkayama, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼140
  50. =1046Liezenlast full day 24 SeptStyria, Austria 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼101
  51. =1046TübingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼135
  52. =1046Munichlast full day 11 OctBavaria, Germany 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼134
  53. =1046Ludwigslustlast full day 10 OctMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼222
  54. =1046Lindaulast full day 10 OctBavaria, Germany 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼157
  55. =1046Bernau bei BerlinBrandenburg, Germany 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼154
  56. =1046CalaisHauts-de-France, France 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼129
  57. =1046KolárovoNitra Region, Slovakia 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  58. =1046ZallaBasque Country, Spain 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline
  59. =1046Nova GoricaUrban Municipality of Nova Gorica, Slovenia 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▲21
  60. =1046AugustaGeorgia, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼112
  61. =1046DearbornMichigan, United States 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼111
  62. =1046AraoKumamoto, Japan 53 US AQI2.1 times the WHO guideline▼110
  63. =1063Isaccealast full day 10 OctTulcea County, Romania 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼140
  64. =1063Uekimachi-mōnoKumamoto, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼126
  65. =1063ShidoKagawa, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼125
  66. =1063SaseboNagasaki, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼124
  67. =1063HigashinozoeHyōgo, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼123
  68. =1063BeppuOita, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼122
  69. =1063IshinomakiMiyagi, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼121
  70. =1063MaidstoneEngland, United Kingdom 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline
  71. =1063BadhoevedorpNorth Holland, The Netherlands 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼119
  72. =1063TraunUpper Austria, Austria 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼60
  73. =1063Sankt ValentinLower Austria, Austria 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼59
  74. =1063Klagenfurt am WörtherseeCarinthia, Austria 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼57
  75. =1063AmstettenLower Austria, Austria 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼56
  76. =1063Weimarlast full day 10 OctThuringia, Germany 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼188
  77. =1063KasselHesse, Germany 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼149
  78. =1063Halstenbeklast full day 10 OctSchleswig-Holstein, Germany 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼147
  79. =1063Burghausenlast full day 10 OctBavaria, Germany 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼111
  80. =1063AvignonProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▲448
  81. =1063SalernoCampania, Italy 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline
  82. =1063BogotáBogota D.C., Colombia 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline
  83. =1063ChattanoogaTennessee, United States 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼76
  84. =1063WindcrestTexas, United States 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼107
  85. =1063BeecherMichigan, United States 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼106
  86. =1063SteubenvilleOhio, United States 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼105
  87. =1063Baker CityOregon, United States 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼104
  88. =1063WenatcheeWashington, United States 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼103
  89. =1063HigashigōSaga, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼68
  90. =1063Kogalast full day 11 OctFukuoka, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼102
  91. =1063AsakuchiOkayama, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼101
  92. =1092Naujoji AkmeneSiauliai, Lithuania 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline
  93. =1092KeelungTaiwan, Taiwan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼96
  94. =1092KosongGangwon-do, South Korea 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼129
  95. =1092ShimogamoOkayama, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼128
  96. =1092Ōyanomachi-noboritateKumamoto, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼92
  97. =1092MiyakonojōMiyazaki, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼127
  98. =1092Kitakyushulast full day 11 OctFukuoka, Japan 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼125
  99. =1092Rostocklast full day 10 OctMecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼238
  100. =1092Neu-Ulmlast full day 10 OctBavaria, Germany 53 US AQI2.0 times the WHO guideline▼145

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).