SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =1991Masudalast full day 11 OctShimane, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼204
  2. =1991MachidaTokyo, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼203
  3. =1991KawagoeSaitama, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼202
  4. =1991KasukabeSaitama, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼201
  5. =1991InoKochi, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼200
  6. =1991HakuiIshikawa, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼199
  7. =1991HadanoKanagawa, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼158
  8. =1991FurukawamenNagasaki, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼198
  9. =1991SayamaSaitama, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼197
  10. =1991SakamotoMiyagi, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼196
  11. =1991IchiharaChiba, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼195
  12. =1991HachinoheAomori, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼194
  13. =1991Kingston upon HullEngland, United Kingdom 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  14. =1991Soestlast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼392
  15. =1991MetzGrand Est, France 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼244
  16. =1991Fos-sur-MerProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  17. =1991GetxoBasque Country, Spain 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  18. =1991AzpeitiaBasque Country, Spain 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  19. =1991PorsgrunnTelemark, Norway 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  20. =1991BessemerAlabama, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼186
  21. =1991Venice Gardenslast full day 11 OctFlorida, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼185
  22. =1991DecaturIllinois, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼184
  23. =1991BloomingtonIndiana, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼183
  24. =1991SomersetKentucky, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼239
  25. =1991Saint JosephMissouri, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼182
  26. =1991BeltonTexas, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼181
  27. =1991DublinOhio, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼179
  28. =1991Alta SierraCalifornia, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼223
  29. =1991MantecaCalifornia, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼178
  30. =1991ModestoCalifornia, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼177
  31. =1991Walla WallaWashington, United States 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼222
  32. =1991KelownaBritish Columbia, Canada 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼175
  33. =1991OakvilleOntario, Canada 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼174
  34. =1991WaterdownOntario, Canada 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼173
  35. =1991L'Ancienne-LoretteQuebec, Canada 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼219
  36. =1991MinokamoGifu, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼123
  37. =1991SennanOsaka, Japan 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼172
  38. =1991Barra da TijucaRio de Janeiro, Brazil 45 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼171
  39. =2039RostusaMavrovo and Rostuša, North Macedonia 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼218
  40. =2039YanagawaFukuoka, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼170
  41. =2039ŌtsuShiga, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼215
  42. =2039Ōdachō-ōdalast full day 11 OctShimane, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼213
  43. =2039ObamaFukui, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼212
  44. =2039KomatsuIshikawa, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼211
  45. =2039KitahamaShiga, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼210
  46. =2039KamakuraKanagawa, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼209
  47. =2039IseharaKanagawa, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼208
  48. =2039HiratsukaKanagawa, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼207
  49. =2039GotembaShizuoka, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼205
  50. =2039AnjōAichi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼204
  51. =2039ShinjōYamagata, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼203
  52. =2039Ōuchilast full day 8 OctMiyagi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼202
  53. =2039Toongabbie WestNew South Wales, Australia 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼199
  54. =2039MuswellbrookNew South Wales, Australia 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼198
  55. =2039GranadaAndalusia, Spain 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  56. =2039ManchesterEngland, United Kingdom 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼241
  57. =2039Sinnersdorflast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼343
  58. =2039Hattingenlast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼340
  59. =2039ToulouseOccitanie, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼155
  60. =2039NîmesOccitanie, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼194
  61. =2039ArrasHauts-de-France, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  62. =2039Aachenlast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼386
  63. =2039JasperIndiana, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼192
  64. =2039New AlbanyIndiana, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼191
  65. =2039OlatheKansas, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼190
  66. =2039Hunt ValleyMaryland, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼145
  67. =2039Kennett SquarePennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼188
  68. =2039AthensTennessee, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼187
  69. =2039KaufmanTexas, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼186
  70. =2039CharlottesvilleVirginia, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼185
  71. =2039Charlestonlast full day 10 OctWest Virginia, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼184
  72. =2039Fort DodgeIowa, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼183
  73. =2039BurnsvilleMinnesota, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼182
  74. =2039BethlehemPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼181
  75. =2039CanonsburgPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼180
  76. =2039GreensburgPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼179
  77. =2039Jefferson HillsPennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼178
  78. =2039PhoenixArizona, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼177
  79. =2039PowayCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼176
  80. =2039StocktonCalifornia, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼175
  81. =2039BandōIbaraki, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼173
  82. =2039InashikiIbaraki, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼172
  83. =2083VratsaVratsa, Bulgaria 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  84. =2083YaitaTochigi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼213
  85. =2083NagaokaNiigata, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼212
  86. =2083MinanoSaitama, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼211
  87. =2083Kaseda-shirakameKagoshima, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼210
  88. =2083KanumaTochigi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼209
  89. =2083Gōtsuchōlast full day 11 OctShimane, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼208
  90. =2083FujisawaKanagawa, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼207
  91. =2083YotsukaidōChiba, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼206
  92. =2083Tagajō-shiMiyagi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼205
  93. =2083HigashineYamagata, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼204
  94. =2083MuroranHokkaido, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼244
  95. =2083TuggeranongAustralian Capital Territory, Australia 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼202
  96. =2083UtielValencia, Spain 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  97. =2083Caravacalast full day 11 OctMurcia, Spain 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  98. =2083SheffieldEngland, United Kingdom 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  99. =2083ReutteTyrol, Austria 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼119
  100. =2083MolFlanders, Belgium 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼241

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).