SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =2083Thalelast full day 10 OctSaxony-Anhalt, Germany 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼339
  2. =2083Sondershausenlast full day 10 OctThuringia, Germany 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼338
  3. =2083Ratingenlast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼386
  4. =2083WexfordLeinster, Ireland 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼200
  5. =2083Saint-MaloBrittany, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  6. =2083RennesBrittany, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼240
  7. =2083OrléansCentre-Val de Loire, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼239
  8. =2083Mont-de-MarsanNew Aquitaine, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼197
  9. =2083MontaubanOccitanie, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  10. =2083JonageAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼280
  11. =2083CreilHauts-de-France, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼279
  12. =2083CastresOccitanie, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼112
  13. =2083Aix-en-ProvenceProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼111
  14. =2083Banská BystricaBanská Bystrica Region, Slovakia 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  15. =2083Mosslast full day 14 SeptØstfold, Norway 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  16. =2083AcariRio de Janeiro, Brazil 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼159
  17. =2083PrichardAlabama, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼194
  18. =2083BearDelaware, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼193
  19. =2083NewarkDelaware, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼192
  20. =2083Bonita SpringsFlorida, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼191
  21. =2083Saint MatthewsKentucky, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼190
  22. =2083South LaurelMaryland, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼233
  23. =2083Lemaylast full day 5 OctMissouri, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼188
  24. =2083ClaytonNorth Carolina, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼187
  25. =2083AshburnVirginia, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼186
  26. =2083Iowa CityIowa, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼185
  27. =2083Jersey CityNew Jersey, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼184
  28. =2083State CollegePennsylvania, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼183
  29. =2083AnthonyNew Mexico, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼268
  30. =2083West JordanUtah, United States 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼181
  31. =2083Val-de-ReuilNormandy, France 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼218
  32. =2083KumanoMie, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼180
  33. =2083YachiyoChiba, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼179
  34. =2083HigashimatsushimaMiyagi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼178
  35. =2083NisshinAichi, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼177
  36. =2083SadoNiigata, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼176
  37. =2083NoboritoKanagawa, Japan 44 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼175
  38. =2138Hualien CityTaiwan, Taiwan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼229
  39. =2138UrayasuChiba, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼228
  40. =2138ShinshiroAichi, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼227
  41. =2138ŌmeTokyo, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼226
  42. =2138NanaoIshikawa, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼225
  43. =2138Kameda-honchōNiigata, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼224
  44. =2138ŌmihachimanShiga, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼223
  45. =2138YachimataChiba, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼222
  46. =2138TorideIbaraki, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼221
  47. =2138MookaTochigi, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼300
  48. =2138KesennumaMiyagi, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼220
  49. =2138AomoriAomori, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼258
  50. =2138TraralgonVictoria, Australia 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼219
  51. =2138SaguntoValencia, Spain 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  52. =2138PlymouthEngland, United Kingdom 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  53. =2138GraysEngland, United Kingdom 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  54. =2138DoncasterEngland, United Kingdom 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  55. =2138OlpeNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  56. =2138Kahlalast full day 10 OctThuringia, Germany 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼337
  57. =2138Esch-sur-AlzetteEsch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼256
  58. =2138ReimsGrand Est, France 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼488
  59. =2138CherbourgNormandy, France 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼250
  60. =2138SarriaGalicia, Spain 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  61. =2138Cangas del Narcealast full day 11 OctAsturias, Spain 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline
  62. =2138ColumbiaMissouri, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼213
  63. =2138GulfportMississippi, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼212
  64. =2138WavelandMississippi, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼211
  65. =2138Toms RiverNew Jersey, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼210
  66. =2138LawtonOklahoma, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼209
  67. =2138SeabrookTexas, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼207
  68. =2138HarrisonburgVirginia, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼206
  69. =2138Saint PaulMinnesota, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼204
  70. =2138HermitagePennsylvania, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼202
  71. =2138MadisonWisconsin, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼201
  72. =2138OaklandCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼200
  73. =2138Woodlandlast full day 17 SeptCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼199
  74. =2138Yuba CityCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼198
  75. =2138Airway HeightsWashington, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼197
  76. =2138ToppenishWashington, United States 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼196
  77. =2138QuesnelBritish Columbia, Canada 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼195
  78. =2138AsoKumamoto, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼194
  79. =2138KikugawaShizuoka, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼146
  80. =2138MotosuGifu, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼193
  81. =2138SayamaOsaka, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼192
  82. =2138BarakiChiba, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼191
  83. =2138Minami-AlpsYamanashi, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼190
  84. =2138IkiNagasaki, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼189
  85. =2138SaikaiNagasaki, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼188
  86. =2138KaminomaAichi, Japan 43 US AQI1.6 times the WHO guideline▼187
  87. =2187TsurugaFukui, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼190
  88. =2187TochigiTochigi, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼235
  89. =2187ShizuokaShizuoka, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼234
  90. =2187ŌtsukiYamanashi, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼233
  91. =2187NiigataNiigata, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼232
  92. =2187NakanojōGunma, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼231
  93. =2187NaganoNagano, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼187
  94. =2187Matsuelast full day 11 OctShimane, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼230
  95. =2187KisarazuChiba, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼229
  96. =2187KakegawaShizuoka, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼228
  97. =2187IidaNagano, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼227
  98. =2187Hamadalast full day 11 OctShimane, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼226
  99. =2187AtamiShizuoka, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼225
  100. =2187Newcastle upon TyneEngland, United Kingdom 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).