SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =2187KollumFriesland, The Netherlands 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼224
  2. =2187Lübecklast full day 10 OctSchleswig-Holstein, Germany 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼441
  3. =2187Klötzelast full day 10 OctSaxony-Anhalt, Germany 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼387
  4. =2187HerrenbergBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼222
  5. =2187Goslarlast full day 10 OctLower Saxony, Germany 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼385
  6. =2187Villefranche-sur-SaôneAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼220
  7. =2187ValenceAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼219
  8. =2187SorbiersAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼218
  9. =2187PoitiersNew Aquitaine, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼266
  10. =2187HarfleurNormandy, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼300
  11. =2187ForbachGrand Est, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  12. =2187Chalon-sur-SaôneBourgogne-Franche-Comté, France 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  13. =2187LillehammerInnlandet, Norway 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  14. =2187SchrieverLouisiana, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼214
  15. =2187GreensboroNorth Carolina, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼213
  16. =2187HickoryNorth Carolina, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼212
  17. =2187RaleighNorth Carolina, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼211
  18. =2187MaryvilleTennessee, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼210
  19. =2187Cedar ParkTexas, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼257
  20. =2187ChampaignIllinois, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼208
  21. =2187AndersonIndiana, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼207
  22. =2187PortlandMaine, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼254
  23. =2187BlaineMinnesota, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼206
  24. =2187MankatoMinnesota, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼205
  25. =2187VirginiaMinnesota, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼252
  26. =2187BridgevillePennsylvania, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼204
  27. =2187ScrantonPennsylvania, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼203
  28. =2187VictorvilleCalifornia, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼202
  29. =2187Sunland ParkNew Mexico, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼286
  30. =2187LockwoodMontana, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼201
  31. =2187BadgerAlaska, United States 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼198
  32. =2187Sorel-TracyQuebec, Canada 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼197
  33. =2187CeutaCeuta, Spain 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  34. =2187ŌsakiMiyagi, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼196
  35. =2187SusonoShizuoka, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼194
  36. =2187NankokuKochi, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼193
  37. =2187NarashinoChiba, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼192
  38. =2187KyōtangoKyoto, Japan 43 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼191
  39. =2239NumataGunma, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼241
  40. =2239NiimiOkayama, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼240
  41. =2239KumagawaFukui, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼238
  42. =2239KanazawaIshikawa, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼237
  43. =2239HamamatsuShizuoka, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼189
  44. =2239FujinomiyaShizuoka, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼236
  45. =2239MiuraKanagawa, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼188
  46. =2239UwajimaEhime, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼235
  47. =2239YamagataYamagata, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼234
  48. =2239NaritaChiba, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼233
  49. =2239MitoIbaraki, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼232
  50. =2239Matsushimalast full day 29 SeptMiyagi, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼231
  51. =2239KōriyamaFukushima, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼230
  52. =2239KasamaIbaraki, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼229
  53. =2239RichmondNew South Wales, Australia 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼228
  54. =2239NewcastleNew South Wales, Australia 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼227
  55. =2239LisbonLisbon, Portugal 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  56. =2239DewsburyEngland, United Kingdom 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  57. =2239ZaventemFlanders, Belgium 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼225
  58. =2239Meiningenlast full day 10 OctThuringia, Germany 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼319
  59. =2239Baden-BadenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼273
  60. =2239WaterfordMunster, Ireland 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  61. =2239PerpignanOccitanie, France 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼317
  62. =2239Donostia / San SebastiánBasque Country, Spain 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  63. =2239MiamiFlorida, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼217
  64. =2239SpringfieldIllinois, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼215
  65. =2239JeffersontownKentucky, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼214
  66. =2239SpringfieldMissouri, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼213
  67. =2239Greenvillelast full day 2 OctNorth Carolina, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼212
  68. =2239UniontownPennsylvania, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼211
  69. =2239HopewellVirginia, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼210
  70. =2239Rose HillVirginia, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼209
  71. =2239Cedar RapidsIowa, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼208
  72. =2239MuscatineIowa, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼261
  73. =2239MolineIllinois, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼207
  74. =2239Fort Leelast full day 11 OctNew Jersey, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼206
  75. =2239LindenNew Jersey, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼205
  76. =2239PatersonNew Jersey, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼204
  77. =2239AllentownPennsylvania, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼203
  78. =2239EriePennsylvania, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼202
  79. =2239WarrenPennsylvania, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼201
  80. =2239BarabooWisconsin, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼200
  81. =2239HermistonOregon, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼199
  82. =2239Liberty LakeWashington, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼198
  83. =2239Vancouverlast full day 6 OctWashington, United States 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼251
  84. =2239Hitachi-NakaIbaraki, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼197
  85. =2239EbinaKanagawa, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼196
  86. =2239AkishimaTokyo, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼195
  87. =2239Minami-SōmaFukushima, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼194
  88. =2239SōsaChiba, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼193
  89. =2239InzaiChiba, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼192
  90. =2290GrevenáWest Macedonia, Greece 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  91. =2290ShironeNiigata, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼242
  92. =2290ShimadaShizuoka, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼241
  93. =2290IshiokaIbaraki, Japan 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼238
  94. =2290AlburyNew South Wales, Australia 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼237
  95. =2290WiganEngland, United Kingdom 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  96. =2290SheringhamEngland, United Kingdom 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  97. =2290NottinghamEngland, United Kingdom 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  98. =2290HooEngland, United Kingdom 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline
  99. =2290PayerneVaud, Switzerland 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼277
  100. =2290GingelomFlanders, Belgium 42 US AQI1.5 times the WHO guideline▼275

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).