SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =2575HitachiomiyaIbaraki, Japan 38 US AQI1.4 times the WHO guideline▼276
  2. =2575KōkaShiga, Japan 38 US AQI1.4 times the WHO guideline▼275
  3. =2575Aizu-WakamatsuFukushima, Japan 38 US AQI1.4 times the WHO guideline▼274
  4. =2575SodegauraChiba, Japan 38 US AQI1.4 times the WHO guideline▼273
  5. =2575EdertalHesse, Germany 38 US AQI1.4 times the WHO guideline▼365
  6. =2606LaaksolahtiUusimaa, Finland 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼303
  7. =2606HitachiIbaraki, Japan 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼302
  8. =2606HanamakiIwate, Japan 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼301
  9. =2606SapporoHokkaido, Japan 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼300
  10. =2606KitamiHokkaido, Japan 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼299
  11. =2606WollongongNew South Wales, Australia 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼298
  12. =2606YorkEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  13. =2606NewportWales, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  14. =2606FarnboroughEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  15. =2606Burton upon TrentEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  16. =2606TrochtelfingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼296
  17. =2606PortlaoiseLeinster, Ireland 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  18. =2606ToursCentre-Val de Loire, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼354
  19. =2606BesançonBourgogne-Franche-Comté, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  20. =2606Beaumont-sur-OiseÎle-de-France, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼351
  21. =2606AuriolProvence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼323
  22. =2606AngoulêmeNew Aquitaine, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼289
  23. =2606AvellinoCampania, Italy 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  24. =2606Highland HeightsKentucky, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼287
  25. =2606HalfwayMaryland, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼286
  26. =2606ArnoldMissouri, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼285
  27. =2606DentOhio, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼284
  28. =2606BrocktonMassachusetts, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼283
  29. =2606Ben LomondCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼282
  30. =2606BrawleyCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼281
  31. =2606El CentroCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼316
  32. =2606ThorntonColorado, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼280
  33. =2606RenoNevada, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼279
  34. =2606GreeleyColorado, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼278
  35. =2606Hood RiverOregon, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼313
  36. =2606SmithfieldUtah, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼277
  37. =2606TacomaWashington, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼275
  38. =2606BrossardQuebec, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼310
  39. =2606ChilliwackBritish Columbia, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼274
  40. =2606MontréalQuebec, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼273
  41. =2606Port AlberniBritish Columbia, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼272
  42. =2606ReginaSaskatchewan, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼271
  43. =2606SaskatoonSaskatchewan, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼270
  44. =2606Williams LakeBritish Columbia, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼268
  45. =2645OmigawaChiba, Japan 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼304
  46. =2645Tōmalast full day 4 OctHokkaido, Japan 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼303
  47. =2645SydneyNew South Wales, Australia 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼302
  48. =2645CanberraAustralian Capital Territory, Australia 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼301
  49. =2645CampbelltownNew South Wales, Australia 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼300
  50. =2645CampillosAndalusia, Spain 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  51. =2645SunderlandEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  52. =2645ReadingEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  53. =2645Milton KeynesEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  54. =2645Market DeepingEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  55. =2645LoughboroughEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  56. =2645LeicesterEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  57. =2645Cheadle HulmeEngland, United Kingdom 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  58. =2645Zell am SeeSalzburg, Austria 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼299
  59. =2645Höhr-Grenzhausenlast full day 10 OctRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼298
  60. =2645BendorfRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼297
  61. =2645DublinLeinster, Ireland 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼334
  62. =2645CorkMunster, Ireland 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  63. =2645Saint-Étienne-de-MontlucPays de la Loire, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  64. =2645OlivetCentre-Val de Loire, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼332
  65. =2645AngletNew Aquitaine, France 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  66. =2645DrammenBuskerud, Norway 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  67. =2645FairfieldAlabama, United States no daily values yet37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼294
  68. =2645Daytona BeachFlorida, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼293
  69. =2645Deerfield BeachFlorida, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼292
  70. =2645Delray BeachFlorida, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼291
  71. =2645GainesvilleFlorida, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼327
  72. =2645LeawoodKansas, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼290
  73. =2645CookevilleTennessee, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼289
  74. =2645Detroit LakesMinnesota, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼288
  75. =2645WatertownSouth Dakota, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼286
  76. =2645BanningCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼285
  77. =2645Galtlast full day 7 OctCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼284
  78. =2645LincolnCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼283
  79. =2645Santa CruzCalifornia, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼282
  80. =2645The DallesOregon, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼280
  81. =2645Rapid CitySouth Dakota, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼279
  82. =2645ProsserWashington, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼315
  83. =2645SheridanWyoming, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼278
  84. =2645Kailua-Konalast full day 30 SeptHawaii, United States 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼277
  85. =2645St. AlbertAlberta, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼308
  86. =2645Swift CurrentSaskatchewan, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼276
  87. =2645QuébecQuebec, Canada 37 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼305
  88. =2688HelsinkiUusimaa, Finland 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼316
  89. =2688SakuNagano, Japan 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼293
  90. =2688NonoichiIshikawa, Japan 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼315
  91. =2688ObihiroHokkaido, Japan 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼314
  92. =2688StawellVictoria, Australia 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼313
  93. =2688MackayQueensland, Australia 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼270
  94. =2688Los BarriosAndalusia, Spain 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  95. =2688PrestonEngland, United Kingdom 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  96. =2688ChesterfieldEngland, United Kingdom 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  97. =2688ChepstowWales, United Kingdom 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  98. =2688BurwellEngland, United Kingdom 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline
  99. =2688BirminghamEngland, United Kingdom 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼537
  100. =2688FreistadtUpper Austria, Austria 36 US AQI1.3 times the WHO guideline▼312

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).