SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =2786AlpineCalifornia, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼356
  2. =2786Redwood CityCalifornia, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼335
  3. =2786AlbuquerqueNew Mexico, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼333
  4. =2786Las VegasNevada, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼332
  5. =2786Pocatellolast full day 8 OctIdaho, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼331
  6. =2786TigardOregon, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼330
  7. =2786RooseveltUtah, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼352
  8. =2786SeattleWashington, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼328
  9. =2786BécancourQuebec, Canada 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼327
  10. =2810GeroGifu, Japan 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼349
  11. =2810KatsuuraChiba, Japan 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼348
  12. =2810TomakomaiHokkaido, Japan 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼347
  13. =2810TownsvilleQueensland, Australia 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼328
  14. =2810SeafordEngland, United Kingdom 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  15. =2810CarlisleEngland, United Kingdom 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  16. =2810BarnstapleEngland, United Kingdom 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  17. =2810Waldfischbach-Burgalbenlast full day 10 OctRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼366
  18. =2810MallowMunster, Ireland 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  19. =2810Mo i Ranalast full day 7 OctNordland, Norway 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  20. =2810São SebastiãoSão Paulo, Brazil 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  21. =2810Belle GladeFlorida, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼343
  22. =2810Sarasota SpringsFlorida, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼342
  23. =2810LafayetteLouisiana, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼341
  24. =2810KeeneNew Hampshire, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼340
  25. =2810Syracuselast full day 11 OctNew York, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼339
  26. =2810El RioCalifornia, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼338
  27. =2810Palo AltoCalifornia, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼116
  28. =2810Rancho MurietaCalifornia, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼337
  29. =2810UkiahCalifornia, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼358
  30. =2810Fort CollinsColorado, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼336
  31. =2810MissoulaMontana, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼335
  32. =2810EugeneOregon, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼334
  33. =2810StaytonOregon, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼333
  34. =2810Brigham CityUtah, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼353
  35. =2810MagnaUtah, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼332
  36. =2810Stansbury parkUtah, United States 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼331
  37. =2810KostelMunicipality of Kostel, Slovenia 34 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼274
  38. =2838PoriSatakunta, Finland 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼378
  39. =2838KamaishiIwate, Japan 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼357
  40. =2838RockhamptonQueensland, Australia 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼355
  41. =2838DunedinOtago, New Zealand 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼374
  42. =2838SwindonEngland, United Kingdom 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  43. =2838ShrewsburyEngland, United Kingdom 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  44. =2838IrlamEngland, United Kingdom 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  45. =2838AndoverEngland, United Kingdom 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  46. =2838RixensartWallonia, Belgium 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼338
  47. =2838Flémalle-HauteWallonia, Belgium 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼373
  48. =2838LimerickMunster, Ireland 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  49. =2838Cluain MealaMunster, Ireland 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼352
  50. =2838BloisCentre-Val de Loire, France 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼556
  51. =2838Villarejo de SalvanésMadrid, Spain 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  52. =2838Lake MaryFlorida, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼351
  53. =2838WellingtonFlorida, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼350
  54. =2838FrostburgMaryland, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼349
  55. =2838RockvilleMaryland, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼348
  56. =2838Fall RiverMassachusetts, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼347
  57. =2838LynnMassachusetts, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼346
  58. =2838MesaArizona, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼345
  59. =2838YrekaCalifornia, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼344
  60. =2838PullmanWashington, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼342
  61. =2838FairbanksAlaska, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼341
  62. =2838OttawaOntario, Canada 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼340
  63. =2863BathurstNew South Wales, Australia 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼364
  64. =2863AlmeríaAndalusia, Spain 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  65. =2863OxfordEngland, United Kingdom 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  66. =2863NaasLeinster, Ireland 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼379
  67. =2863GreystonesLeinster, Ireland 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼397
  68. =2863FraminghamMassachusetts, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼361
  69. =2863Haverhilllast full day 9 OctMassachusetts, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼360
  70. =2863LowellMassachusetts, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼359
  71. =2863North AdamsMassachusetts, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼358
  72. =2863MarshallMinnesota, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼357
  73. =2863AtascaderoCalifornia, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼356
  74. =2863GilroyCalifornia, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼354
  75. =2863North AuburnCalifornia, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼353
  76. =2863GlendiveMontana, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼351
  77. =2863Grants PassOregon, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼368
  78. =2863HerrimanUtah, United States 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼350
  79. =2863PeterboroughOntario, Canada 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼349
  80. =2863Albion Park RailNew South Wales, Australia 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼348
  81. =2863Grand CentreAlberta, Canada 33 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼347
  82. =2882LohjaUusimaa, Finland 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼365
  83. =2882Port MacquarieNew South Wales, Australia 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼364
  84. =2882BrisbaneQueensland, Australia 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼310
  85. =2882LavertonVictoria, Australia 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼362
  86. =2882WrexhamWales, United Kingdom 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  87. =2882StreetEngland, United Kingdom 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  88. =2882RoscommonConnacht, Ireland 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  89. =2882KillarneyMunster, Ireland 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼397
  90. =2882BermeoBasque Country, Spain 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  91. =2882OsloOslo, Norway 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline
  92. =2882CambridgeMaryland, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼358
  93. =2882WorcesterMassachusetts, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼357
  94. =2882AugustaMaine, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼356
  95. =2882ArvadaColorado, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼353
  96. =2882ReddingCalifornia, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼352
  97. =2882HillsboroOregon, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼351
  98. =2882North OgdenUtah, United States 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼350
  99. =2882Parry SoundOntario, Canada 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼348
  100. =2882Münstertal/SchwarzwaldBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼402

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).