SmogRank / Rankings

All 3,198 cities by PM2.5, this year

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA and Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (336 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. 2882ŌshūIwate, Japan 32 US AQI1.2 times the WHO guideline▼347
  2. =2902LappeenrantaSouth Karelia, Finland 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼365
  3. =2902InaNagano, Japan 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼364
  4. =2902MaryboroughQueensland, Australia 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼383
  5. =2902AmoraSetúbal, Portugal 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  6. =2902CharleroiWallonia, Belgium 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼381
  7. =2902Roetgenlast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼401
  8. =2902CavanUlster, Ireland 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼380
  9. =2902La Ferté-MacéNormandy, France 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼379
  10. =2902CorteCorsica, France 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  11. =2902TelfordEngland, United Kingdom 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  12. =2902Palm BayFlorida, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼362
  13. =2902BangorMaine, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼375
  14. =2902ProvidenceRhode Island, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼360
  15. =2902HartfordVermont, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼359
  16. =2902ChicoCalifornia, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼358
  17. =2902ConcordCalifornia, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼357
  18. =2902OjaiCalifornia, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼355
  19. =2902Thousand OaksCalifornia, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼391
  20. =2902DenverColorado, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼354
  21. =2902LubbockTexas, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼353
  22. =2902GreshamOregon, United States 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼352
  23. =2902AbbotsfordBritish Columbia, Canada 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼369
  24. =2902Greater SudburyOntario, Canada 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼350
  25. =2902SquamishBritish Columbia, Canada 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼349
  26. =2902AintreeVictoria, Australia 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼348
  27. =2902KallahtiUusimaa, Finland 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼347
  28. =2902Harewoodlast full day 5 OctBritish Columbia, Canada 32 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼346
  29. =2929KushiroHokkaido, Japan 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼371
  30. =2929GeelongVictoria, Australia 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼390
  31. =2929GlasgowScotland, United Kingdom 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  32. =2929AberdeenScotland, United Kingdom 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  33. =2929Kirchzartenlast full day 9 OctBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼355
  34. =2929GlashüttenHesse, Germany 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼370
  35. =2929PittsfieldMassachusetts, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼369
  36. =2929QuincyMassachusetts, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼368
  37. =2929LewistonMaine, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼367
  38. =2929BellevueNebraska, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼366
  39. =2929La VistaNebraska, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼365
  40. =2929PortsmouthNew Hampshire, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼388
  41. =2929CrestlineCalifornia, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼383
  42. =2929SebastopolCalifornia, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼401
  43. =2929AlbanyOregon, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼364
  44. =2929SalemOregon, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼363
  45. =2929Cedar Hillslast full day 11 OctUtah, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼362
  46. =2929BellinghamWashington, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼361
  47. =2929Port AngelesWashington, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼360
  48. =2929Fort St. JohnBritish Columbia, Canada 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼378
  49. =2949MorwellVictoria, Australia 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼379
  50. =2949GoulburnNew South Wales, Australia 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼378
  51. =2949MiddlesbroughEngland, United Kingdom 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  52. =2949HonitonEngland, United Kingdom 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  53. =2949SwordsLeinster, Ireland 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  54. =2949East LakeFlorida, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼374
  55. =2949Red Hilllast full day 5 OctSouth Carolina, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼373
  56. =2949North ChicopeeMassachusetts, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼372
  57. =2949UxbridgeMassachusetts, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼371
  58. =2949EnochUtah, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼369
  59. =2949Crescent CityCalifornia, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼368
  60. =2949AshlandOregon, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼367
  61. =2949CanbyOregon, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼366
  62. =2949Columbia CityWashington, United States 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  63. =2949North BayOntario, Canada 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼365
  64. =2949SherbrookeQuebec, Canada 31 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼364
  65. =2965TartuTartu, Estonia 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼408
  66. =2965GreenockScotland, United Kingdom 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  67. =2965GrangemouthScotland, United Kingdom 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  68. =2965SurseeLucerne, Switzerland 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼353
  69. =2965TournaiWallonia, Belgium 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼392
  70. =2965NamurWallonia, Belgium 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼378
  71. =2965Netphenlast full day 10 OctNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  72. =2965Braunlagelast full day 10 OctLower Saxony, Germany 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼377
  73. =2965AurillacAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼376
  74. =2965RijekaPrimorje-Gorski Kotar, Croatia 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  75. =2965MarvinNorth Carolina, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼375
  76. =2965LondonderryNew Hampshire, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼374
  77. =2965Casas AdobesArizona, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼373
  78. =2965TracyCalifornia, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼371
  79. =2965WillowsCalifornia, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼386
  80. =2965Colorado SpringsColorado, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼369
  81. =2965Spanish SpringsNevada, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼368
  82. =2965Red BluffCalifornia, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼367
  83. =2965Idaho FallsIdaho, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼365
  84. =2965Oregon CityOregon, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼357
  85. =2965ParklandWashington, United States 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼364
  86. =2965GibsonsBritish Columbia, Canada 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼363
  87. =2965SaguenayQuebec, Canada 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼362
  88. =2965VictoriaBritish Columbia, Canada 30 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼361
  89. =2989Uticalast full day 11 OctNew York, United States 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼383
  90. =2989PawtucketRhode Island, United States 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼382
  91. =2989AlamosaColorado, United States 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼394
  92. =2989GreenOregon, United States 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼371
  93. =2989Saint-Jean-sur-RichelieuQuebec, Canada 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼380
  94. =2989Picnic Point-North LynnwoodWashington, United States 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline▼379
  95. =2989High PeakEngland, United Kingdom 29 US AQI1.1 times the WHO guideline
  96. =2996LahtiPaijat-Hame, Finland 29 US AQI1.0 times the WHO guideline▼385
  97. =2996ChampionWallonia, Belgium 29 US AQI1.0 times the WHO guideline▼391
  98. =2996Rabo de PeixeAzores, Portugal 29 US AQI1.0 times the WHO guideline
  99. =2996Newburghlast full day 11 OctNew York, United States 29 US AQI1.0 times the WHO guideline▼383
  100. =2996Big Bear CityCalifornia, United States 29 US AQI1.0 times the WHO guideline▼382

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), this year to 14 Oct 2026, 06:00 UTC: each city's mean of its daily means, cities measured on 70% or more of the days since 1 January (at least 14). Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=year. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #2 Faisalabad, #3 Gujranwala and #6 Lahore. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 06:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Department of Environment, Nepal; Vietnam's government monitors; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).