SmogRank / Cleaner or dirtier / Poland
Poland: cleaner or dirtier, 2025
In Poland, 62 cities have enough days in both years to compare 2025 with the same days of 2024: 38 got dirtier and 24 cleaner.
The 38 cities that got dirtier, biggest rise first
| # | City | 2024 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ŻywiecSilesia, Poland | 69 | 82 | +7.3 µg/m³+39% |
| 2 | WschowaLubusz, Poland | 56 | 66 | +4.9 µg/m³+41% |
| 3 | ŁódźŁódź Voivodeship, Poland | 61 | 68 | +3.9 µg/m³+27% |
| 4 | OtwockMazovia, Poland | 68 | 74 | +3.2 µg/m³+17% |
| 5 | ŁaskŁódź Voivodeship, Poland | 68 | 74 | +3.1 µg/m³+17% |
| 6 | KaliszGreater Poland, Poland | 68 | 74 | +2.9 µg/m³+16% |
| 7 | Bielsko-BialaSilesia, Poland | 69 | 75 | +2.8 µg/m³+15% |
| 8 | WrocławLower Silesia, Poland | 62 | 67 | +2.8 µg/m³+19% |
| 9 | ŻaryLubusz, Poland | 54 | 59 | +2.8 µg/m³+27% |
| 10 | SuwałkiPodlasie, Poland | 48 | 55 | +2.5 µg/m³+29% |
| 11 | JasłoSubcarpathia, Poland | 54 | 58 | +2.2 µg/m³+21% |
| 12 | EłkWarmia-Masuria, Poland | 54 | 58 | +2.2 µg/m³+21% |
| 13 | ToruńKujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 62 | 66 | +2.1 µg/m³+14% |
| 14 | KłodzkoLower Silesia, Poland | 66 | 70 | +2.1 µg/m³+12% |
| 15 | PoznańGreater Poland, Poland | 65 | 69 | +2.0 µg/m³+12% |
| 16 | WawerMazovia, Poland | 59 | 63 | +1.9 µg/m³+14% |
| 17 | AugustówPodlasie, Poland | 66 | 70 | +1.9 µg/m³+11% |
| 18 | Jelenia GóraLower Silesia, Poland | 61 | 64 | +1.7 µg/m³+12% |
| 19 | KołobrzegWest Pomerania, Poland | 53 | 56 | +1.7 µg/m³+17% |
| 20 | KutnoŁódź Voivodeship, Poland | 69 | 73 | +1.7 µg/m³+9% |
| 21 | Gorzów WielkopolskiLubusz, Poland | 60 | 63 | +1.5 µg/m³+11% |
| 22 | GdańskPomerania, Poland | 57 | 60 | +1.4 µg/m³+11% |
| 23 | ŚwiecieKujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 57 | 59 | +1.4 µg/m³+11% |
| 24 | TarnówLesser Poland, Poland | 58 | 60 | +1.3 µg/m³+10% |
| 25 | ŻyrardówMazovia, Poland | 62 | 64 | +0.9 µg/m³+6% |
| 26 | WarsawMazovia, Poland | 60 | 62 | +0.9 µg/m³+6% |
| 27 | Skarżysko-KamiennaŚwiętokrzyskie, Poland | 71 | 73 | +0.9 µg/m³+4% |
| 28 | GdyniaPomerania, Poland | 60 | 61 | +0.7 µg/m³+5% |
| 29 | KielceŚwiętokrzyskie, Poland | 67 | 68 | +0.6 µg/m³+3% |
| 30 | Czechowice-DziedziceSilesia, Poland | 67 | 68 | +0.6 µg/m³+3% |
| 31 | RzeszówSubcarpathia, Poland | 62 | 63 | +0.5 µg/m³+3% |
| 32 | RadomskoŁódź Voivodeship, Poland | 68 | 69 | +0.4 µg/m³+2% |
| 33 | BiałystokPodlasie, Poland | 59 | 59 | +0.4 µg/m³+3% |
| 34 | RadomMazovia, Poland | 65 | 66 | +0.4 µg/m³+2% |
| 35 | WłocławekKujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 70 | 71 | +0.3 µg/m³+2% |
| 36 | NiskoSubcarpathia, Poland | 66 | 66 | +0.3 µg/m³+2% |
| 37 | JarosławSubcarpathia, Poland | 63 | 63 | +0.1 µg/m³+1% |
| 38 | ElblągWarmia-Masuria, Poland | 60 | 60 | +0.1 µg/m³+1% |
The 24 cities that got cleaner, biggest fall first
| # | City | 2024 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RacibórzSilesia, Poland | 71 | 59 | −6.1 µg/m³−31% |
| 2 | Kędzierzyn-KoźleOpole Voivodeship, Poland | 67 | 60 | −4.2 µg/m³−23% |
| 3 | KatowiceSilesia, Poland | 71 | 64 | −3.8 µg/m³−19% |
| 4 | OpoleOpole Voivodeship, Poland | 68 | 62 | −3.2 µg/m³−17% |
| 5 | KościerzynaPomerania, Poland | 59 | 54 | −2.8 µg/m³−21% |
| 6 | MielecSubcarpathia, Poland | 67 | 62 | −2.5 µg/m³−14% |
| 7 | Zielona GóraLubusz, Poland | 59 | 56 | −1.7 µg/m³−13% |
| 8 | PrzemyślSubcarpathia, Poland | 66 | 62 | −1.7 µg/m³−10% |
| 9 | DębicaSubcarpathia, Poland | 66 | 63 | −1.3 µg/m³−8% |
| 10 | KrosnoSubcarpathia, Poland | 54 | 52 | −1.2 µg/m³−11% |
| 11 | OlsztynWarmia-Masuria, Poland | 60 | 58 | −1.1 µg/m³−8% |
| 12 | LegionowoMazovia, Poland | 64 | 62 | −1.1 µg/m³−7% |
| 13 | Jastrzębie ZdrójSilesia, Poland | 73 | 71 | −1.1 µg/m³−5% |
| 14 | BytówPomerania, Poland | 54 | 52 | −1.0 µg/m³−9% |
| 15 | SzczecinWest Pomerania, Poland | 61 | 59 | −1.0 µg/m³−7% |
| 16 | StarachowiceŚwiętokrzyskie, Poland | 65 | 64 | −0.8 µg/m³−5% |
| 17 | BydgoszczKujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 61 | 60 | −0.8 µg/m³−5% |
| 18 | PołaniecŚwiętokrzyskie, Poland | 68 | 66 | −0.7 µg/m³−4% |
| 19 | LublinPoland | 66 | 65 | −0.6 µg/m³−3% |
| 20 | PruszkówMazovia, Poland | 65 | 64 | −0.5 µg/m³−3% |
| 21 | Konstancin-JeziornaMazovia, Poland | 62 | 61 | −0.4 µg/m³−3% |
| 22 | PłockMazovia, Poland | 59 | 59 | −0.2 µg/m³−1% |
| 23 | ZamośćLublin, Poland | 64 | 64 | −0.2 µg/m³−1% |
| 24 | KrakówLesser Poland, Poland | 67 | 67 | −0.2 µg/m³−1% |
Means in US AQI over the days a city was measured in both years, the same calendar days each year; a city needs 55% of the days paired, and at least 30. The change is in µg/m³ and per cent. How we compare.
Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+
The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales
Updated 2026-10-07 12:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index.