SmogRank / Cleaner or dirtier
Cleaner or dirtier: 2025
2,124 measured cities have enough days in both years to compare 2025 with the same days of 2024: 1,505 got dirtier and 550 cleaner. Biggest rise first.
The 50 biggest rises
| # | City | 2024 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DushanbeTajikistan | 133 | 158 | +16.8 µg/m³+35% |
| 2 | Quezon CityNational Capital Region, Philippines | 67 | 80 | +7.4 µg/m³+42% |
| 3 | ŻywiecSilesia, Poland | 69 | 82 | +7.3 µg/m³+39% |
| 4 | OnomichiHiroshima, Japan | 47 | 60 | +5.2 µg/m³+61% |
| 5 | El PasoTexas, United States | 55 | 64 | +5.0 µg/m³+45% |
| 6 | Shin’ichiHiroshima, Japan | 46 | 59 | +5.0 µg/m³+60% |
| 7 | WschowaLubusz, Poland | 56 | 66 | +4.9 µg/m³+41% |
| 8 | WenatcheeWashington, United States | 30 | 53 | +4.7 µg/m³+87% |
| 9 | AlmatyKazakhstan | 76 | 85 | +4.6 µg/m³+20% |
| 10 | SinhyeonGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea | 52 | 60 | +4.6 µg/m³+48% |
| 11 | HaenamJeollanam-do, South Korea | 54 | 62 | +4.4 µg/m³+42% |
| 12 | MarquetteMichigan, United States | 24 | 49 | +4.4 µg/m³+100% |
| 13 | ConcónValparaiso, Chile | 75 | 83 | +4.3 µg/m³+20% |
| 14 | VentspilsLatvia | 43 | 56 | +4.0 µg/m³+52% |
| 15 | ŁódźŁódź Voivodeship, Poland | 61 | 68 | +3.9 µg/m³+27% |
| 16 | TakamatsuKagawa, Japan | 44 | 56 | +3.8 µg/m³+48% |
| 17 | BrookingsSouth Dakota, United States | 34 | 52 | +3.7 µg/m³+61% |
| 18 | SuperiorWisconsin, United States | 34 | 52 | +3.7 µg/m³+61% |
| 19 | ObrenovacCentral Serbia, Serbia | 73 | 80 | +3.7 µg/m³+18% |
| 20 | PristinaKosovo | 52 | 59 | +3.7 µg/m³+38% |
| 21 | SaguntoValencia, Spain | 26 | 46 | +3.6 µg/m³+77% |
| 22 | AnacortesWashington, United States | 19 | 39 | +3.6 µg/m³+103% |
| 23 | Williams LakeBritish Columbia, Canada | 17 | 37 | +3.6 µg/m³+120% |
| 24 | KariyaAichi, Japan | 42 | 55 | +3.5 µg/m³+46% |
| 25 | NangenJeollabuk-do, South Korea | 56 | 63 | +3.4 µg/m³+29% |
| 26 | SpeyerRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 52 | 58 | +3.4 µg/m³+36% |
| 27 | DuluthMinnesota, United States | 32 | 51 | +3.4 µg/m³+59% |
| 28 | SocorroTexas, United States | 54 | 60 | +3.3 µg/m³+31% |
| 29 | AnanTokushima, Japan | 52 | 58 | +3.3 µg/m³+35% |
| 30 | VirginiaMinnesota, United States | 32 | 51 | +3.3 µg/m³+57% |
| 31 | NeuwiedRheinland-Pfalz, Germany | 46 | 56 | +3.3 µg/m³+40% |
| 32 | OtwockMazovia, Poland | 68 | 74 | +3.2 µg/m³+17% |
| 33 | HeilbronnBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 51 | 57 | +3.2 µg/m³+35% |
| 34 | HigashinozoeHyōgo, Japan | 51 | 57 | +3.2 µg/m³+35% |
| 35 | SandpointIdaho, United States | 41 | 54 | +3.2 µg/m³+44% |
| 36 | ŁaskŁódź Voivodeship, Poland | 68 | 74 | +3.1 µg/m³+17% |
| 37 | Santa MonicaCalifornia, United States | 52 | 58 | +3.1 µg/m³+32% |
| 38 | YaeHiroshima, Japan | 38 | 52 | +3.1 µg/m³+46% |
| 39 | VientianeVientiane Prefecture, Laos | 80 | 86 | +3.1 µg/m³+12% |
| 40 | SantyokuGangwon-do, South Korea | 56 | 62 | +3.0 µg/m³+25% |
| 41 | BeppuOita, Japan | 51 | 57 | +3.0 µg/m³+32% |
| 42 | FriedrichshafenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany | 46 | 55 | +3.0 µg/m³+37% |
| 43 | SekimachiGifu, Japan | 46 | 55 | +3.0 µg/m³+37% |
| 44 | KaliszGreater Poland, Poland | 68 | 74 | +2.9 µg/m³+16% |
| 45 | Prince AlbertSaskatchewan, Canada | 55 | 60 | +2.9 µg/m³+26% |
| 46 | YeongamJeollanam-do, South Korea | 52 | 58 | +2.9 µg/m³+30% |
| 47 | The HagueSouth Holland, The Netherlands | 39 | 53 | +2.9 µg/m³+41% |
| 48 | Des MoinesIowa, United States | 33 | 49 | +2.9 µg/m³+48% |
| 49 | ShingūWakayama, Japan | 31 | 47 | +2.9 µg/m³+53% |
| 50 | CallaoPeru | 72 | 77 | +2.9 µg/m³+14% |
The 50 biggest falls
| # | City | 2024 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Santa MaríaLima region, Peru | 161 | 124 | −24.1 µg/m³−35% |
| 2 | LahorePunjab, Pakistan | 235 | 218 | −17.4 µg/m³−11% |
| 3 | KolkataWest Bengal, India | 163 | 152 | −15.5 µg/m³−21% |
| 4 | Port IsabelTexas, United States | 75 | 60 | −8.1 µg/m³−37% |
| 5 | PeshawarKhyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan | 189 | 184 | −8.1 µg/m³−7% |
| 6 | JakartaIndonesia | 115 | 96 | −7.8 µg/m³−19% |
| 7 | KathmanduBagmati Province, Nepal | 152 | 135 | −7.7 µg/m³−14% |
| 8 | HualpénBiobio, Chile | 134 | 116 | −7.0 µg/m³−14% |
| 9 | DebrecenHajdú-Bihar, Hungary | 82 | 69 | −6.8 µg/m³−26% |
| 10 | Banja LukaSrpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 105 | 92 | −6.2 µg/m³−17% |
| 11 | CelayaGuanajuato, Mexico | 79 | 67 | −6.2 µg/m³−26% |
| 12 | RacibórzSilesia, Poland | 71 | 59 | −6.1 µg/m³−31% |
| 13 | La UniónLos Ríos Region, Chile | 106 | 93 | −5.9 µg/m³−16% |
| 14 | DelhiIndia | 184 | 179 | −5.8 µg/m³−6% |
| 15 | SarajevoFederation of B&H, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 107 | 94 | −5.8 µg/m³−15% |
| 16 | MeridianIdaho, United States | 54 | 31 | −5.1 µg/m³−48% |
| 17 | Puerto MonttLos Lagos Region, Chile | 99 | 90 | −5.0 µg/m³−14% |
| 18 | MumbaiMaharashtra, India | 122 | 111 | −4.8 µg/m³−11% |
| 19 | MissionTexas, United States | 61 | 53 | −4.6 µg/m³−32% |
| 20 | ShreveportLouisiana, United States | 54 | 34 | −4.4 µg/m³−42% |
| 21 | SokchoGangwon-do, South Korea | 62 | 54 | −4.2 µg/m³−28% |
| 22 | Kędzierzyn-KoźleOpole Voivodeship, Poland | 67 | 60 | −4.2 µg/m³−23% |
| 23 | SheridanWyoming, United States | 49 | 26 | −4.1 µg/m³−47% |
| 24 | Timberwood ParkTexas, United States | 55 | 42 | −3.9 µg/m³−34% |
| 25 | KatowiceSilesia, Poland | 71 | 64 | −3.8 µg/m³−19% |
| 26 | TalcahuanoBiobio, Chile | 91 | 84 | −3.7 µg/m³−12% |
| 27 | OsornoLos Lagos Region, Chile | 126 | 117 | −3.7 µg/m³−8% |
| 28 | HualquiBiobio, Chile | 96 | 89 | −3.7 µg/m³−11% |
| 29 | CoyhaiqueAysén, Chile | 144 | 135 | −3.7 µg/m³−7% |
| 30 | CuranilahueBiobio, Chile | 105 | 96 | −3.6 µg/m³−10% |
| 31 | BartlettTennessee, United States | 55 | 44 | −3.5 µg/m³−30% |
| 32 | ToméBiobio, Chile | 83 | 77 | −3.3 µg/m³−13% |
| 33 | Puerto AysénAysén, Chile | 96 | 90 | −3.3 µg/m³−10% |
| 34 | QuillotaValparaiso, Chile | 85 | 79 | −3.2 µg/m³−12% |
| 35 | OpoleOpole Voivodeship, Poland | 68 | 62 | −3.2 µg/m³−17% |
| 36 | CauquenesMaule Region, Chile | 87 | 81 | −3.2 µg/m³−11% |
| 37 | YeojuGyeonggi-do, South Korea | 70 | 64 | −3.0 µg/m³−16% |
| 38 | BendOregon, United States | 47 | 31 | −2.9 µg/m³−35% |
| 39 | BirminghamAlabama, United States | 59 | 54 | −2.9 µg/m³−22% |
| 40 | RedmondOregon, United States | 42 | 26 | −2.9 µg/m³−38% |
| 41 | CoronelBiobio, Chile | 94 | 89 | −2.9 µg/m³−9% |
| 42 | HyderabadTelangana, India | 115 | 108 | −2.9 µg/m³−7% |
| 43 | NampaIdaho, United States | 52 | 39 | −2.8 µg/m³−28% |
| 44 | BreukelenUtrecht, The Netherlands | 55 | 47 | −2.8 µg/m³−25% |
| 45 | MaarssenUtrecht, The Netherlands | 55 | 47 | −2.8 µg/m³−25% |
| 46 | KościerzynaPomerania, Poland | 59 | 54 | −2.8 µg/m³−21% |
| 47 | NyíregyházaSzabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hungary | 64 | 59 | −2.8 µg/m³−18% |
| 48 | ChillánÑuble, Chile | 96 | 91 | −2.7 µg/m³−8% |
| 49 | East LakeFlorida, United States | 48 | 33 | −2.7 µg/m³−31% |
| 50 | HollisterCalifornia, United States | 41 | 26 | −2.6 µg/m³−36% |
Means in US AQI over the days a city was measured in both years, the same calendar days each year; a city needs 55% of the days paired, and at least 30. The change is in µg/m³ and per cent. How we compare.
Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+
The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales
By country
Australia 21Belgium 33Bosnia and Herzegovina 2Bulgaria 5Canada 108Chile 45Ethiopia 1Finland 11Germany 176Ghana 1Hong Kong 13Hungary 9Iceland 3India 5Japan 537Kazakhstan 1Laos 1Latvia 4Luxembourg 1Mexico 5Nepal 1New Zealand 4Norway 17Pakistan 3Peru 6Philippines 1Poland 57Portugal 1Romania 4Serbia 2Slovakia 9South Africa 1South Korea 140Spain 15Sweden 2Switzerland 2Tajikistan 1Thailand 7The Netherlands 17United Kingdom 4United States 721
Updated 2026-10-07 12:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index.