SmogRank / Rankings

516 cities by checked peak, last 7 days

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). EEA in Spain: no readings since 13 Oct (310 monitors). Their cities show older figures or are missing from this board, not clean.

Ranked by checked peak: each city's worst 6 hours in a row, read by at least 2 monitoring places 3 km or more apart (the second-highest place's average over those hours), so one faulty monitor or smoke over one corner of a city can't set it. 516 of these 2,895 cities are ranked: those measured at 2 or more such places on enough of the days.

  1. =201ChuncheonGangwon-do, South Korea 71
  2. =201TemucoAraucania, Chile 71
  3. =203TullnLower Austria, Austria 70
  4. =203León de los AldamaGuanajuato, Mexico 70
  5. 205LinzUpper Austria, Austria 70
  6. =206YeongjuGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea 70
  7. =206Jeju CityJeju-do, South Korea 70
  8. =206ViennaVienna, Austria 70
  9. =206InglewoodCalifornia, United States 70
  10. =210Yangp'yŏngGyeonggi-do, South Korea 69
  11. =210BusanBusan, South Korea 69
  12. =210HayashimaOkayama, Japan 69
  13. =210GamagōriAichi, Japan 69
  14. 214Munichlast full day 11 OctBavaria, Germany 69
  15. =215UlsanUlsan, South Korea 69
  16. =215SaijōEhime, Japan 69
  17. =215Attnang-PuchheimUpper Austria, Austria 69
  18. =215QuinteroValparaiso, Chile 69
  19. =219YokkaichiMie, Japan 69
  20. =219Fort WorthTexas, United States 69
  21. 221GimcheonGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea 69
  22. 222Kakogawachō-honmachiHyōgo, Japan 68
  23. =223IchinomiyaAichi, Japan 68
  24. =223PuchuncavíValparaiso, Chile 68
  25. =225AmandelbultLimpopo, South Africa 68
  26. =225QuillotaValparaiso, Chile 68
  27. =225KuwanaMie, Japan 68
  28. =228ŌitaOita, Japan 68
  29. =228HamamatsuShizuoka, Japan 68
  30. =228FukuokaFukuoka, Japan 68
  31. =228Viña del MarValparaiso, Chile 68
  32. 232AmstettenLower Austria, Austria 67
  33. =233HonmachiKumamoto, Japan 67
  34. =233Kashihara-shiNara, Japan 67
  35. =233SeogwipoJeju-do, South Korea 67
  36. =236ShimonosekiYamaguchi, Japan 67
  37. =236MadridMadrid, Spain 67
  38. =236SaitamaSaitama, Japan 67
  39. =236IgaMie, Japan 67
  40. 240OconomowocWisconsin, United States 67
  41. 241ChangsuJeollabuk-do, South Korea 66
  42. =242ChinjuGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea 66
  43. =242KotōKumamoto, Japan 66
  44. =244SaseboNagasaki, Japan 66
  45. =244KōnosuSaitama, Japan 66
  46. =244FukuyamaHiroshima, Japan 66
  47. =244AsahikawaHokkaido, Japan 66
  48. =244ShikokuchūōEhime, Japan 66
  49. 249KimhaeGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea 66
  50. 250JacksonMississippi, United States 66
  51. =251SuzukaMie, Japan 65
  52. =251SōjaOkayama, Japan 65
  53. =251GwangyangJeollanam-do, South Korea 65
  54. =251Groß-EnzersdorfLower Austria, Austria 65
  55. =251BratislavaBratislava Region, Slovakia 65
  56. =256YangsanGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea 65
  57. =256AccraGreater Accra, Ghana 65
  58. 258MenumaSaitama, Japan 65
  59. =259KimitsuChiba, Japan 65
  60. =259MiddletownOhio, United States 65
  61. =261OsakaOsaka, Japan 64
  62. =261MoriokaIwate, Japan 64
  63. =261SevillaAndalusia, Spain 64
  64. =261BakersfieldCalifornia, United States 64
  65. =261CarsonCalifornia, United States 64
  66. =266HiroshimaHiroshima, Japan 64
  67. =266FujiShizuoka, Japan 64
  68. =266ZapopanJalisco, Mexico 64
  69. =269UjiKyoto, Japan 64
  70. =269KureHiroshima, Japan 64
  71. =269KishiwadaOsaka, Japan 64
  72. =272BrisbaneQueensland, Australia 64
  73. =272ChicagoIllinois, United States 64
  74. =274KusatsuShiga, Japan 63
  75. =274KumamotoKumamoto, Japan 63
  76. =274UngsangGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea 63
  77. =274MinneapolisMinnesota, United States 63
  78. =278TsuMie, Japan 63
  79. =278ŌtsuShiga, Japan 63
  80. =278NumazuShizuoka, Japan 63
  81. =281Ciudad JuárezChihuahua, Mexico 63
  82. =281WheatonIllinois, United States 63
  83. =281TorranceCalifornia, United States 63
  84. =284KaunasKaunas, Lithuania 63
  85. =284KoshigayaSaitama, Japan 63
  86. =284KisarazuChiba, Japan 63
  87. =284KawaguchiSaitama, Japan 63
  88. =284Los AngelesCalifornia, United States 63
  89. =284MercedCalifornia, United States 63
  90. 290La Línea de la ConcepciónAndalusia, Spain 63
  91. =291TokyoTokyo, Japan 63
  92. =291NaganoNagano, Japan 63
  93. =291ProvidenceRhode Island, United States 63
  94. =291ChikumaNagano, Japan 63
  95. =295YokohamaKanagawa, Japan 62
  96. =295KukichūōSaitama, Japan 62
  97. =295AiharaKanagawa, Japan 62
  98. =298LouisvilleKentucky, United States 62
  99. =298CeresCalifornia, United States 62
  100. 300OkayamaOkayama, Japan 62

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by checked peak PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 7 days to 14 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC: each city's worst 6 hours in a row, read by 2 or more monitoring places 3 km or more apart, cities with a checked peak on 5 or more of the 7 days. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings?w=7d&by=peak. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Burunday, #2 Faisalabad, #3 Otegen Batyra, #4 Multan, #6 Peshawar, #7 Lahore, #8 Gujranwala, #9 Dhaka and #10 Kinshasa. Some readings from Aurassure; Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 by average (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 07:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some readings: Aurassure; Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland); Love My Air (City and County of Denver), no reuse terms published (why we use them).