SmogRank / History / July 14, 2024

Most polluted cities on July 14, 2024

2,325 cities ranked by their average PM2.5 over the day; the worst was Rancagua, Chile, at 204.0 µg/m³. Each city's own local calendar day.

Bad-air episodes during July 14, 2024. All episodes.

← Rancagua 204.0 µg/m³ 200 µg/m³15 WHO 24-hour guideline
Every city ranked for July 14, 2024, one column each, worst on the left and cleanest on the right; height is PM2.5 in µg/m³. Point at it to read a city; tap to open it.
  1. 1RancaguaO'Higgins Region, Chile
    27913.6×
  2. 2CoyhaiqueAysén, Chile
    25411.9×
  3. 3Puerto MonttLos Lagos Region, Chile
    23810.8×
  4. 4SheridanWyoming, United States
    2209.7×
  5. 5Kinshasalow-cost sensorsKinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
    2048.6×
  6. 6VillarricaAraucania, Chile
    2028.5×
  7. 7RengoO'Higgins Region, Chile
    2008.3×
  8. 7CuricóMaule Region, Chile
    2008.3×
  9. 9TemucoAraucania, Chile
    1968.0×
  10. 10OsornoLos Lagos Region, Chile
    1947.8×
  11. 11Los ÁngelesBiobio, Chile
    1917.5×
  12. 12La UniónLos Ríos Region, Chile
    1897.3×
  13. 13Lahorelow-cost sensorsPunjab, Pakistan
    1887.2×
  14. 14TalaganteSantiago Metropolitan, Chile
    1877.1×
  15. 15SantiagoSantiago Metropolitan, Chile
    1867.0×
  16. 16HualpénBiobio, Chile
    1867.0×
  17. 17Puerto VarasLos Lagos Region, Chile
    1826.6×
  18. 18ValdiviaLos Ríos Region, Chile
    1796.3×
  19. 19CuranilahueBiobio, Chile
    1786.3×
  20. 20ShenyangLiaoning, China
    1745.8×
  21. 21ChillánÑuble, Chile
    1685.3×
  22. 22NacimientoBiobio, Chile
    1675.2×
  23. 23Fort McMurrayAlberta, Canada
    1665.1×
  24. 24QuilpuéValparaiso, Chile
    1655.1×
  25. 25QuillotaValparaiso, Chile
    1634.9×
  26. 25Puente AltoSantiago Metropolitan, Chile
    1634.9×
  27. 27TalcaMaule Region, Chile
    1634.9×
  28. 28San CarlosÑuble, Chile
    1624.8×
  29. 29BeijingBeijing, China
    1624.7×
  30. 30HualquiBiobio, Chile
    1614.7×
  31. 31TalcahuanoBiobio, Chile
    1594.4×
  32. 32Santa Anita - Los FicusLima region, Peru
    1584.4×
  33. 33Ban Talat BuengChon Buri, Thailand
    1564.2×
  34. 34MaputoMaputo City, Mozambique
    1543.9×
  35. 35ChiguayanteBiobio, Chile
    1523.8×
  36. 36Puerto AysénAysén, Chile
    1513.7×
  37. 37CauquenesMaule Region, Chile
    1483.6×
  38. 38QuinteroValparaiso, Chile
    1463.6×
  39. 39Viña del MarValparaiso, Chile
    1423.5×
  40. 40CoronelBiobio, Chile
    1413.4×
  41. 41Peshawarlow-cost sensorsKhyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    1363.3×
  42. 42ConcepciónBiobio, Chile
    1323.2×
  43. 43JakartaJakarta, Indonesia
    1253.0×
  44. 43San Pedro de la PazBiobio, Chile
    1253.0×
  45. 45DelhiDelhi, India
    1222.9×
  46. 46BaghdadBaghdad, Iraq
    1212.9×
  47. 47ConcónValparaiso, Chile
    1202.9×
  48. 48Addis AbabaAddis Ababa, Ethiopia
    1162.8×
  49. 49Dhakalow-cost sensorsDhaka Division, Bangladesh
    1122.7×
  50. 50ToméBiobio, Chile
    1112.6×
  51. 51ShanghaiShanghai, China
    1102.6×
  52. 52NagaiYamagata, Japan
    1022.4×
  53. 53LimaLima Province, Peru
    992.3×
  54. 54SagaeYamagata, Japan
    982.3×
  55. 55CairoCairo, Egypt
    982.3×
  56. 56Shakaskraallow-cost sensorsKwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    972.3×
  57. 57SakataYamagata, Japan
    962.2×
  58. 58YonezawaYamagata, Japan
    952.2×
  59. 59TsuruokaYamagata, Japan
    952.2×
  60. 60AshgabatAshgabat, Turkmenistan
    952.2×
  61. 61YokoteAkita, Japan
    952.2×
  62. 62HirosakiAomori, Japan
    942.2×
  63. 63Niitsu-honchōNiigata, Japan
    942.1×
  64. 63YamagataYamagata, Japan
    942.1×
  65. 65AomoriAomori, Japan
    932.1×
  66. 66Kampalalow-cost sensorsCentral Region, Uganda
    912.0×
  67. 67SadoNiigata, Japan
    912.0×
  68. 68ShibataNiigata, Japan
    902.0×
  69. 69LazarevacCentral Serbia, Serbia
    902.0×
  70. 69MoriokaIwate, Japan
    902.0×
  71. 71GoshogawaraAomori, Japan
    892.0×
  72. 72NagaokaNiigata, Japan
    892.0×
  73. 72Kameda-honchōNiigata, Japan
    892.0×
  74. 72ShonaiYamagata, Japan
    892.0×
  75. 75ShironeNiigata, Japan
    892.0×
  76. 76Şabāḩ as SālimMubārak al Kabīr, Kuwait
    881.9×
  77. 77NiigataNiigata, Japan
    881.9×
  78. 78Ganghwa-gunIncheon, South Korea
    871.9×
  79. 79SarajevoFederation of B&H, Bosnia and Herzegovina
    871.9×
  80. 80HigashineYamagata, Japan
    861.9×
  81. 80AkitaAkita, Japan
    861.9×
  82. 82MakiNiigata, Japan
    861.9×
  83. 82OgaAkita, Japan
    861.9×
  84. 84La SerenaCoquimbo Region, Chile
    861.9×
  85. 85NoshiroAkita, Japan
    851.8×
  86. 86ŌdateAkita, Japan
    851.8×
  87. 87TakizawaIwate, Japan
    841.8×
  88. 88Debrecenlow-cost sensorsHajdú-Bihar, Hungary
    831.8×
  89. 89KōriyamaFukushima, Japan
    831.8×
  90. 89CoquimboCoquimbo Region, Chile
    831.8×
  91. 91Karachilow-cost sensorsSindh, Pakistan
    821.7×
  92. 91ToledoOhio, United States
    821.7×
  93. 93ChikuseiIbaraki, Japan
    821.7×
  94. 94Aizu-WakamatsuFukushima, Japan
    821.7×
  95. 95Goyang-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    811.7×
  96. 96HanamGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    801.7×
  97. 96HanamakiIwate, Japan
    801.7×
  98. 98ValjevoCentral Serbia, Serbia
    801.6×
  99. 98San Francisco De BorjaLima region, Peru
    801.6×
  100. 100Gimpo-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    801.6×
  101. 100JōetsuNiigata, Japan
    801.6×
  102. 102ConroeTexas, United States
    801.6×
  103. 103FukushimaFukushima, Japan
    791.6×
  104. 104Jurong WestSingapore
    791.6×
  105. 105GwangmyeongGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    791.6×
  106. 106SeoulSeoul, South Korea
    781.6×
  107. 107BakersfieldCalifornia, United States
    781.6×
  108. 108Eagle PassTexas, United States
    771.6×
  109. 109Guri-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    771.5×
  110. 110Accralow-cost sensorsGreater Accra, Ghana
    771.5×
  111. 110BirminghamAlabama, United States
    771.5×
  112. 112HachinoheAomori, Japan
    771.5×
  113. 113Ang Mo Kio New TownSingapore
    771.5×
  114. 114IncheonIncheon, South Korea
    761.5×
  115. 115KomárnoNitra Region, Slovakia
    761.5×
  116. 116Icheon-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  117. 117ZemunCentral Serbia, Serbia
    761.5×
  118. 117ObrenovacCentral Serbia, Serbia
    761.5×
  119. 117Uijeongbu-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  120. 120GapyeongGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  121. 120ShiroishiMiyagi, Japan
    761.5×
  122. 120MeridianIdaho, United States
    761.5×
  123. 123TarnówLesser Poland, Poland
    751.5×
  124. 123NamyangjuGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    751.5×
  125. 123Apache JunctionArizona, United States
    751.5×
  126. 123TooeleUtah, United States
    751.5×
  127. 127Twin FallsIdaho, United States
    751.5×
  128. 127Nepeanlow-cost sensorsOntario, Canada
    751.5×
  129. 129ShirakawaFukushima, Japan
    751.5×
  130. 130AntananarivoAnalamanga, Madagascar
    751.5×
  131. 131IwakiFukushima, Japan
    751.5×
  132. 132MunsanGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    741.4×
  133. 132HimimachiToyama, Japan
    741.4×
  134. 134WŏnjuGangwon-do, South Korea
    741.4×
  135. 134AntofagastaAntofagasta, Chile
    741.4×
  136. 134PhoenixArizona, United States
    741.4×
  137. 137Islamabadlow-cost sensorsIslamabad, Pakistan
    741.4×
  138. 137MitoIbaraki, Japan
    741.4×
  139. 137LotaBiobio, Chile
    741.4×
  140. 140CallaoCallao, Peru
    741.4×
  141. 140MesaArizona, United States
    741.4×
  142. 142Bang NaBangkok, Thailand
    741.4×
  143. 142KasamaIbaraki, Japan
    741.4×
  144. 142LawrencevilleGeorgia, United States
    741.4×
  145. 145YeojuGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    731.4×
  146. 146WabuGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    731.4×
  147. 147NanaoIshikawa, Japan
    731.4×
  148. 148TimaruCanterbury, New Zealand
    731.4×
  149. 149MiyakoIwate, Japan
    721.4×
  150. 150GwangjuGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    721.4×
  151. 151TangjinChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    721.4×
  152. 151NampaIdaho, United States
    721.4×
  153. 153Kathmandulow-cost sensorsBagmati Province, Nepal
    711.3×
  154. 153Minami-SōmaFukushima, Japan
    711.3×
  155. 155Bucheon-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    711.3×
  156. 155HakuiIshikawa, Japan
    711.3×
  157. 155Alto HospicioTarapacá, Chile
    711.3×
  158. 158AricaArica y Parinacota Region, Chile
    711.3×
  159. 159GyöngyösHeves County, Hungary
    711.3×
  160. 159TocopillaAntofagasta, Chile
    711.3×
  161. 159Little RockArkansas, United States
    711.3×
  162. 162UžiceCentral Serbia, Serbia
    711.3×
  163. 162BoiseIdaho, United States
    711.3×
  164. 164MiskolcBorsod-Abaúj-Zemplén, Hungary
    701.3×
  165. 164HwadoGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    701.3×
  166. 166TatebayashiGunma, Japan
    701.3×
  167. 167Ulan BatorUlaanbaatar, Mongolia
    701.3×
  168. 167NitraNitra Region, Slovakia
    701.3×
  169. 167TempeArizona, United States
    701.3×
  170. 170SalorTashkent Region, Uzbekistan
    701.3×
  171. 171GostivarGostivar, North Macedonia
    701.3×
  172. 171BelgradeCentral Serbia, Serbia
    701.3×
  173. 171IchinosekiIwate, Japan
    701.3×
  174. 171Villa Poeta José Gálvez BarrenecheaLima region, Peru
    701.3×
  175. 175Cluj-NapocaCluj County, Romania
    691.3×
  176. 175Yangp'yŏngGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    691.3×
  177. 175CheorwonGangwon-do, South Korea
    691.3×
  178. 175TokonameAichi, Japan
    691.3×
  179. 175ItoigawaNiigata, Japan
    691.3×
  180. 180Anyang-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    691.3×
  181. 180KazoSaitama, Japan
    691.3×
  182. 180GyōdaSaitama, Japan
    691.3×
  183. 180Jacobo HunterArequipa, Peru
    691.3×
  184. 180ImizuToyama, Japan
    691.3×
  185. 185SremčicaCentral Serbia, Serbia
    691.3×
  186. 185PančevoVojvodina, Serbia
    691.3×
  187. 185OyamaTochigi, Japan
    691.3×
  188. 185NasukarasuyamaTochigi, Japan
    691.3×
  189. 189TetovoTetovo, North Macedonia
    691.2×
  190. 189Abujalow-cost sensorsFCT, Nigeria
    691.2×
  191. 191SōmaFukushima, Japan
    691.2×
  192. 192SuwonGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  193. 192ToyamaToyama, Japan
    681.2×
  194. 192N'DjamenaN’Djaména, Chad
    681.2×
  195. 195Hwaseong-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  196. 195Ansan-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  197. 195Falconara MarittimaThe Marches, Italy
    681.2×
  198. 195BartlettTennessee, United States
    681.2×
  199. 199SninaPrešov Region, Slovakia
    681.2×
  200. 199TakaokaToyama, Japan
    681.2×

Top 200 of 2,325 shown.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China and Turkey, which publish no terms that let us reuse their readings. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, most polluted cities, PM2.5, July 14, 2024, smogrank.com/history/2024-07-14 (accessed 3 Oct 2026).

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms.