SmogRank / History / August 10, 2024

Most polluted cities on August 10, 2024

2,374 cities ranked by their average PM2.5 over the day; the worst was Curicó, Chile, at 127.0 µg/m³. Each city's own local calendar day.

← Curicó 127.0 µg/m³ 100 µg/m³15 WHO 24-hour guideline
Every city ranked for August 10, 2024, one column each, worst on the left and cleanest on the right; height is PM2.5 in µg/m³. Point at it to read a city; tap to open it.
  1. 1CuricóMaule Region, Chile
    2028.5×
  2. 2Santa Anita - Los FicusLima region, Peru
    1806.5×
  3. 3ChillánÑuble, Chile
    1735.8×
  4. 4NacimientoBiobio, Chile
    1604.6×
  5. 5RancaguaO'Higgins Region, Chile
    1584.4×
  6. 6CuranilahueBiobio, Chile
    1584.4×
  7. 7CoronelBiobio, Chile
    1564.2×
  8. 8Los ÁngelesBiobio, Chile
    1564.1×
  9. 9RengoO'Higgins Region, Chile
    1533.9×
  10. 10HualquiBiobio, Chile
    1523.8×
  11. 11TalcaMaule Region, Chile
    1523.8×
  12. 12Lahorelow-cost sensorsPunjab, Pakistan
    1513.7×
  13. 13Peshawarlow-cost sensorsKhyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
    1433.5×
  14. 14SantiagoSantiago Metropolitan, Chile
    1403.4×
  15. 15TalaganteSantiago Metropolitan, Chile
    1383.4×
  16. 16TemucoAraucania, Chile
    1323.2×
  17. 17VillarricaAraucania, Chile
    1313.2×
  18. 18Puerto AysénAysén, Chile
    1253.0×
  19. 19LimaLima Province, Peru
    1253.0×
  20. 20Kampalalow-cost sensorsCentral Region, Uganda
    1192.9×
  21. 21QuilpuéValparaiso, Chile
    1172.8×
  22. 22CoyhaiqueAysén, Chile
    1162.8×
  23. 23CauquenesMaule Region, Chile
    1132.7×
  24. 24Dhakalow-cost sensorsDhaka Division, Bangladesh
    1102.6×
  25. 25AltamontOregon, United States
    1092.6×
  26. 26La UniónLos Ríos Region, Chile
    1042.5×
  27. 27AntananarivoAnalamanga, Madagascar
    1022.4×
  28. 28Abujalow-cost sensorsFCT, Nigeria
    1022.4×
  29. 29QuillotaValparaiso, Chile
    1012.4×
  30. 30Puente AltoSantiago Metropolitan, Chile
    1012.4×
  31. 31Puerto VarasLos Lagos Region, Chile
    992.3×
  32. 32ChiguayanteBiobio, Chile
    982.3×
  33. 33ToméBiobio, Chile
    952.2×
  34. 33San Francisco De BorjaLima region, Peru
    952.2×
  35. 35QuinteroValparaiso, Chile
    952.2×
  36. 36OsornoLos Lagos Region, Chile
    942.2×
  37. 37JakartaJakarta, Indonesia
    932.1×
  38. 38KolkataWest Bengal, India
    932.1×
  39. 39Viña del MarValparaiso, Chile
    932.1×
  40. 40Puerto MonttLos Lagos Region, Chile
    932.1×
  41. 41Şabāḩ as SālimMubārak al Kabīr, Kuwait
    881.9×
  42. 42BaghdadBaghdad, Iraq
    871.9×
  43. 43TalcahuanoBiobio, Chile
    851.8×
  44. 44ValdiviaLos Ríos Region, Chile
    851.8×
  45. 45ConcónValparaiso, Chile
    841.8×
  46. 46HualpénBiobio, Chile
    841.8×
  47. 47KwangyangJeollanam-do, South Korea
    841.8×
  48. 48Prince GeorgeBritish Columbia, Canada
    831.8×
  49. 49La SerenaCoquimbo Region, Chile
    831.8×
  50. 50IncheonIncheon, South Korea
    821.7×
  51. 51MaputoMaputo City, Mozambique
    821.7×
  52. 51N'DjamenaN’Djaména, Chad
    821.7×
  53. 53GwangmyeongGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    811.7×
  54. 54ShanghaiShanghai, China
    811.7×
  55. 55TangjinChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    811.7×
  56. 55Gimpo-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    811.7×
  57. 57AntofagastaAntofagasta, Chile
    811.7×
  58. 58MukdahanMukdahan, Thailand
    801.7×
  59. 58Ganghwa-gunIncheon, South Korea
    801.7×
  60. 60Ban Talat BuengChon Buri, Thailand
    801.6×
  61. 61DelhiDelhi, India
    801.6×
  62. 62Asunciónlow-cost sensorsAsuncion, Paraguay
    801.6×
  63. 63Iloilolow-cost sensorsWestern Visayas, Philippines
    791.6×
  64. 63CoquimboCoquimbo Region, Chile
    791.6×
  65. 63HadongGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
    791.6×
  66. 66YesanChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    791.6×
  67. 67MedfordOregon, United States
    791.6×
  68. 68NonsanChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    791.6×
  69. 68MeridianIdaho, United States
    791.6×
  70. 70Fort McMurrayAlberta, Canada
    791.6×
  71. 71Collado-VillalbaMadrid, Spain
    781.6×
  72. 71ConcepciónBiobio, Chile
    781.6×
  73. 73SeoulSeoul, South Korea
    781.6×
  74. 73PyeongtaekGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    781.6×
  75. 75SeonghwanChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    781.6×
  76. 75BoiseIdaho, United States
    781.6×
  77. 77OsanGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    771.5×
  78. 77CopiapóAtacama, Chile
    771.5×
  79. 79Hwaseong-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    771.5×
  80. 79KomárnoNitra Region, Slovakia
    771.5×
  81. 81Shakaskraallow-cost sensorsKwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
    761.5×
  82. 82AsanChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  83. 82Ansan-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  84. 82GwangyangJeollanam-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  85. 82HanamGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  86. 82MóstolesMadrid, Spain
    761.5×
  87. 87KalasinKalasin, Thailand
    761.5×
  88. 87ChocopeLa Libertad, Peru
    761.5×
  89. 87Jacobo HunterArequipa, Peru
    761.5×
  90. 87JeongeupJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    761.5×
  91. 91YakimaWashington, United States
    751.5×
  92. 92JaénAndalusia, Spain
    751.5×
  93. 93NampaIdaho, United States
    751.5×
  94. 94SuwonGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    751.5×
  95. 94Guri-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    751.5×
  96. 94Chinch'ŏnNorth Chungcheong, South Korea
    751.5×
  97. 97Islamabadlow-cost sensorsIslamabad, Pakistan
    741.4×
  98. 98JinchengFukien, Taiwan
    741.4×
  99. 99TocopillaAntofagasta, Chile
    741.4×
  100. 100Goyang-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    741.4×
  101. 101Bang NaBangkok, Thailand
    741.4×
  102. 101Villa Poeta José Gálvez BarrenecheaLima region, Peru
    741.4×
  103. 103BeijingBeijing, China
    731.4×
  104. 103BendOregon, United States
    731.4×
  105. 105CheonanChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    731.4×
  106. 105OurenseGalicia, Spain
    731.4×
  107. 105SejongSejong-si, South Korea
    731.4×
  108. 108Bucheon-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    731.4×
  109. 108Anyang-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    731.4×
  110. 110TratTrat, Thailand
    731.4×
  111. 111LewistonIdaho, United States
    731.4×
  112. 112ChennaiTamil Nadu, India
    721.4×
  113. 113Sing BuriSing Buri, Thailand
    721.4×
  114. 113Icheon-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    721.4×
  115. 113IndioCalifornia, United States
    721.4×
  116. 116OkcheonNorth Chungcheong, South Korea
    721.4×
  117. 116Twin FallsIdaho, United States
    721.4×
  118. 118AricaArica y Parinacota Region, Chile
    721.3×
  119. 118Lat KrabangBangkok, Thailand
    721.3×
  120. 120JungpyongNorth Chungcheong, South Korea
    711.3×
  121. 121SaraburiSaraburi, Thailand
    711.3×
  122. 121SuncheonJeollanam-do, South Korea
    711.3×
  123. 121AshlandOregon, United States
    711.3×
  124. 124MoscowIdaho, United States
    711.3×
  125. 125ChangnyeongGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
    701.3×
  126. 126Nakhon RatchasimaNakhon Ratchasima, Thailand
    701.3×
  127. 127Amnat CharoenAmnat Charoen, Thailand
    701.3×
  128. 127HayangGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea
    701.3×
  129. 127Jurupa ValleyCalifornia, United States
    701.3×
  130. 130GongjuChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    701.3×
  131. 131YasothonYasothon, Thailand
    701.3×
  132. 131RedmondOregon, United States
    701.3×
  133. 133Khon KaenKhon Kaen, Thailand
    691.3×
  134. 133DamyangJeollanam-do, South Korea
    691.3×
  135. 133NamyangjuGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    691.3×
  136. 136SquamishBritish Columbia, Canada
    691.3×
  137. 137GwangjuGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    691.3×
  138. 138WŏnjuGangwon-do, South Korea
    691.2×
  139. 138MokpoJeollanam-do, South Korea
    691.2×
  140. 140KimjeJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    691.2×
  141. 140CalamaAntofagasta, Chile
    691.2×
  142. 140Great FallsMontana, United States
    691.2×
  143. 143ChinjuGyeongsangnam-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  144. 143The DallesOregon, United States
    681.2×
  145. 145MinamataKumamoto, Japan
    681.2×
  146. 145Sydneylow-cost sensorsNew South Wales, Australia
    681.2×
  147. 147HongseongChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  148. 147Seongnam-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  149. 147CalgaryAlberta, Canada
    681.2×
  150. 150GumiGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea
    681.2×
  151. 150KanoyaKagoshima, Japan
    681.2×
  152. 150HermistonOregon, United States
    681.2×
  153. 153Si Maha PhotPrachin Buri, Thailand
    681.2×
  154. 153NichinanMiyazaki, Japan
    681.2×
  155. 153Saphan SungBangkok, Thailand
    681.2×
  156. 156AnseongGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    671.2×
  157. 156KofuYamanashi, Japan
    671.2×
  158. 156PentictonBritish Columbia, Canada
    671.2×
  159. 159AshgabatAshgabat, Turkmenistan
    671.2×
  160. 159IksanJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    671.2×
  161. 159KochiKochi, Japan
    671.2×
  162. 159ConroeTexas, United States
    671.2×
  163. 159FontanaCalifornia, United States
    671.2×
  164. 164NangenJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    671.2×
  165. 165NanNan, Thailand
    671.2×
  166. 165NobeokaMiyazaki, Japan
    671.2×
  167. 165SevillaAndalusia, Spain
    671.2×
  168. 165VigoGalicia, Spain
    671.2×
  169. 165HyūgaMiyazaki, Japan
    671.2×
  170. 170Uijeongbu-siGyeonggi-do, South Korea
    661.2×
  171. 170Cheongju-siNorth Chungcheong, South Korea
    661.2×
  172. 170RoveretoTrentino-Alto Adige, Italy
    661.2×
  173. 170PocatelloIdaho, United States
    661.2×
  174. 170Prince AlbertSaskatchewan, Canada
    661.2×
  175. 175PullmanWashington, United States
    661.2×
  176. 176GostivarGostivar, North Macedonia
    661.1×
  177. 176BuanJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    661.1×
  178. 176CórdobaAndalusia, Spain
    661.1×
  179. 179ŻabbarĦaż-Żabbar, Malta
    661.1×
  180. 179Alto HospicioTarapacá, Chile
    661.1×
  181. 179GlendoraCalifornia, United States
    661.1×
  182. 179EdmontonAlberta, Canada
    661.1×
  183. 183TakanabeMiyazaki, Japan
    661.1×
  184. 183Grants PassOregon, United States
    661.1×
  185. 185GunsanJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    661.1×
  186. 185VictorvilleCalifornia, United States
    661.1×
  187. 187HyderabadTelangana, India
    651.1×
  188. 187YeongdongNorth Chungcheong, South Korea
    651.1×
  189. 187EisenGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea
    651.1×
  190. 187DaejeonDaejeon, South Korea
    651.1×
  191. 187GimcheonGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea
    651.1×
  192. 192Bang Bo DistrictSamut Prakan, Thailand
    651.1×
  193. 192WaegwanGyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea
    651.1×
  194. 192KinzanChungcheongnam-do, South Korea
    651.1×
  195. 192KoesanNorth Chungcheong, South Korea
    651.1×
  196. 192BolzanoTrentino-Alto Adige, Italy
    651.1×
  197. 192Yuba CityCalifornia, United States
    651.1×
  198. 198HumennéPrešov Region, Slovakia
    651.1×
  199. 198WanjuJeollabuk-do, South Korea
    651.1×
  200. 198Ang Mo Kio New TownSingapore
    651.1×

Top 200 of 2,374 shown.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China and Turkey, which publish no terms that let us reuse their readings. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, most polluted cities, PM2.5, August 10, 2024, smogrank.com/history/2024-08-10 (accessed 3 Oct 2026).

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms.