SmogRank / History / week of September 23, 2024
Most polluted cities, week of September 23, 2024
1,545 cities ranked by their average PM2.5 over the 7 days. A city needs measurements on 70% of the days to be ranked.
| # | City | µg/m³ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kampala low-cost sensors Central Region, Uganda | 111.9 | |
| 2 | Salor Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan | 96.2 | |
| 3 | Kinshasa low-cost sensors Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo | 79.2 | |
| 4 | Lahore low-cost sensors Punjab, Pakistan | 73.6 | |
| 5 | Peshawar low-cost sensors Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan | 67.5 | |
| 6 | Addis Ababa Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | 63.2 | |
| 7 | Dushanbe Dushanbe, Tajikistan | 61.7 | |
| 8 | Santa Anita - Los Ficus Lima region, Peru | 54.6 | |
| 9 | Ashgabat Ashgabat, Turkmenistan | 49.1 | |
| 10 | Jakarta Jakarta, Indonesia | 43.5 | |
| 11 | Dhaka low-cost sensors Dhaka Division, Bangladesh | 43.0 | |
| 12 | Hanoi Hanoi, Vietnam | 42.6 | |
| 13 | Delhi Delhi, India | 42.4 | |
| 14 | Asunción low-cost sensors Asuncion, Paraguay | 41.7 | |
| 15 | Beijing Beijing, China | 41.3 | |
| 16 | Şabāḩ as Sālim Mubārak al Kabīr, Kuwait | 39.8 | |
| 17 | Islamabad low-cost sensors Islamabad, Pakistan | 39.3 | |
| 18 | Baghdad Baghdad, Iraq | 38.4 | |
| 19 | Antananarivo Analamanga, Madagascar | 36.3 | |
| 20 | Cairo Cairo, Egypt | 34.4 | |
| 21 | Yanacancha Pasco, Peru | 33.4 | |
| 22 | Maputo Maputo City, Mozambique | 33.3 | |
| 23 | Jacobo Hunter Arequipa, Peru | 30.1 | |
| 24 | N'Djamena N’Djaména, Chad | 29.7 | |
| 25 | Vereeniging low-cost sensors Gauteng, South Africa | 27.4 | |
| 26 | San Francisco De Borja Lima region, Peru | 27.0 | |
| 27 | Guangzhou Guangdong, China | 25.1 | |
| 28 | Bangkok low-cost sensors Bangkok, Thailand | 24.9 | |
| 29 | Kathmandu low-cost sensors Bagmati Province, Nepal | 24.7 | |
| 30 | Kraljevo Central Serbia, Serbia | 24.2 | |
| 31 | Bogotá Bogota D.C., Colombia | 23.5 | |
| 32 | São Paulo São Paulo, Brazil | 23.2 | |
| 33 | Villa Poeta José Gálvez Barrenechea Lima region, Peru | 22.4 | |
| 34 | Hyderabad Telangana, India | 22.3 | |
| 35 | Astana Astana, Kazakhstan | 21.9 | |
| 36 | Callao Callao, Peru | 21.2 | |
| 37 | Wan Chai Wan Chai, Hong Kong | 20.8 | |
| 38 | Algiers Algiers, Algeria | 20.7 | |
| 39 | Chennai Tamil Nadu, India | 20.5 | |
| 40 | Fontana California, United States | 19.7 | |
| 41 | San Clemente Ica, Peru | 18.8 | |
| 42 | Yauri Cuzco Department, Peru | 18.7 | |
| 43 | Jurupa Valley California, United States | 18.0 | |
| 44 | Shakaskraal low-cost sensors KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa | 17.6 | |
| 45 | Debrecen low-cost sensors Hajdú-Bihar, Hungary | 17.5 | |
| 46 | Chocope La Libertad, Peru | 17.4 | |
| 47 | Miskolc Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén, Hungary | 17.3 | |
| 47 | Riverside California, United States | 17.3 | |
| 49 | Fanling North District, Hong Kong | 17.2 | |
| 50 | Smederevo Central Serbia, Serbia | 16.8 | |
| 51 | Ćuprija Central Serbia, Serbia | 16.3 | |
| 52 | Shanghai Shanghai, China | 16.2 | |
| 52 | Rabinal Baja Verapaz, Guatemala | 16.2 | |
| 54 | Guatemala City Guatemala, Guatemala | 15.9 | |
| 55 | Niš Central Serbia, Serbia | 15.7 | |
| 56 | Užice Central Serbia, Serbia | 15.2 | |
| 57 | Novi Pazar Central Serbia, Serbia | 15.1 | |
| 57 | Fengshan Takao, Taiwan | 15.1 | |
| 57 | Jurong West Singapore | 15.1 | |
| 57 | Los Angeles California, United States | 15.1 | |
| 61 | Nyíregyháza Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hungary | 14.7 | |
| 61 | Anaheim California, United States | 14.7 | |
| 61 | Fresno California, United States | 14.7 | |
| 61 | Visalia California, United States | 14.7 | |
| 65 | Tuen Mun Tuen Mun, Hong Kong | 14.4 | |
| 66 | Ang Mo Kio New Town Singapore | 14.3 | |
| 67 | Tin Shui Wai Yuen Long, Hong Kong | 14.1 | |
| 67 | Chimbote Ancash, Peru | 14.1 | |
| 67 | Inglewood low-cost sensors California, United States | 14.1 | |
| 70 | Carson low-cost sensors California, United States | 14.0 | |
| 70 | Glendora California, United States | 14.0 | |
| 72 | Zemun Central Serbia, Serbia | 13.8 | |
| 73 | Hanford California, United States | 13.7 | |
| 73 | Porterville California, United States | 13.7 | |
| 75 | Yongkang Taiwan, Taiwan | 13.6 | |
| 76 | Novi Sad Vojvodina, Serbia | 13.4 | |
| 76 | West Memphis Arkansas, United States | 13.4 | |
| 76 | Burbank California, United States | 13.4 | |
| 79 | Xinying Taiwan, Taiwan | 13.3 | |
| 79 | Banja Luka Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 13.3 | |
| 79 | Clovis California, United States | 13.3 | |
| 79 | Santa Monica low-cost sensors California, United States | 13.3 | |
| 83 | Yuanlin Taiwan, Taiwan | 13.2 | |
| 83 | San Tung Chung Hang Islands, Hong Kong | 13.2 | |
| 83 | Mong Kok Yau Tsim Mong District, Hong Kong | 13.2 | |
| 83 | Tijuana Baja California, Mexico | 13.2 | |
| 83 | Hawthorne low-cost sensors California, United States | 13.2 | |
| 88 | Richards Bay low-cost sensors KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa | 13.1 | |
| 89 | Grajewo Podlasie, Poland | 13.0 | |
| 89 | Birmingham Alabama, United States | 13.0 | |
| 91 | Tai Po Tai Po, Hong Kong | 12.9 | |
| 91 | Gdynia Pomerania, Poland | 12.9 | |
| 93 | Łuków Lublin, Poland | 12.8 | |
| 93 | Honmachi Kumamoto, Japan | 12.8 | |
| 95 | Obrenovac Central Serbia, Serbia | 12.7 | |
| 95 | Minamata Kumamoto, Japan | 12.7 | |
| 95 | Valjevo Central Serbia, Serbia | 12.7 | |
| 95 | Corcoran California, United States | 12.7 | |
| 99 | Lublin Lublin, Poland | 12.6 | |
| 99 | Douliu Taiwan, Taiwan | 12.6 | |
| 99 | Ulan Bator Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia | 12.6 | |
| 102 | Erlun Taiwan, Taiwan | 12.5 | |
| 102 | Gdańsk Pomerania, Poland | 12.5 | |
| 102 | Futog Vojvodina, Serbia | 12.5 | |
| 105 | Zhushan Taiwan, Taiwan | 12.4 | |
| 105 | Ōtsuki Yamanashi, Japan | 12.4 | |
| 105 | Agoura low-cost sensors California, United States | 12.4 | |
| 108 | Kwai Chung Kwai Tsing District, Hong Kong | 12.3 | |
| 108 | La Crescenta-Montrose low-cost sensors California, United States | 12.3 | |
| 110 | Ulu Bedok Singapore | 12.2 | |
| 110 | Torrance low-cost sensors California, United States | 12.2 | |
| 112 | Otwock Mazovia, Poland | 12.1 | |
| 112 | Gainesville Georgia, United States | 12.1 | |
| 112 | Lawrenceville Georgia, United States | 12.1 | |
| 115 | Pruszków Mazovia, Poland | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Pirot Central Serbia, Serbia | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Kolkata West Bengal, India | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Tha Bo Nong Khai, Thailand | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Tsuen Wan Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Katowice Silesia, Poland | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Lomita low-cost sensors California, United States | 12.0 | |
| 115 | Arden-Arcade California, United States | 12.0 | |
| 123 | Woodlands Singapore | 11.9 | |
| 123 | Sopot Pomerania, Poland | 11.9 | |
| 123 | Conroe Texas, United States | 11.9 | |
| 123 | Nogales Arizona, United States | 11.9 | |
| 127 | Yerevan low-cost sensors Yerevan, Armenia | 11.8 | |
| 127 | Rapid City South Dakota, United States | 11.8 | |
| 129 | Mumbai Maharashtra, India | 11.7 | |
| 130 | Radom Mazovia, Poland | 11.6 | |
| 130 | Kaohsiung Takao, Taiwan | 11.6 | |
| 130 | Saiki Oita, Japan | 11.6 | |
| 130 | Bielsko-Biala Silesia, Poland | 11.6 | |
| 130 | Yuma Arizona, United States | 11.6 | |
| 135 | Starachowice Świętokrzyskie, Poland | 11.5 | |
| 135 | Lazarevac Central Serbia, Serbia | 11.5 | |
| 135 | Kalisz Greater Poland, Poland | 11.5 | |
| 135 | Santa Clarita California, United States | 11.5 | |
| 139 | Puli Taiwan, Taiwan | 11.4 | |
| 139 | Accra low-cost sensors Greater Accra, Ghana | 11.4 | |
| 139 | El Cajon California, United States | 11.4 | |
| 142 | Pančevo Vojvodina, Serbia | 11.3 | |
| 142 | Sham Shui Po Sham Shui Po District, Hong Kong | 11.3 | |
| 142 | Toki Gifu, Japan | 11.3 | |
| 142 | Szczecin West Pomerania, Poland | 11.3 | |
| 142 | Lafayette Louisiana, United States | 11.3 | |
| 142 | Bizen Okayama, Japan | 11.3 | |
| 148 | Konstancin-Jeziorna Mazovia, Poland | 11.2 | |
| 148 | Belgrade Central Serbia, Serbia | 11.2 | |
| 148 | Bydgoszcz Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 11.2 | |
| 151 | Zamość Lublin, Poland | 11.1 | |
| 151 | Nisko Subcarpathia, Poland | 11.1 | |
| 151 | Tainan Taiwan, Taiwan | 11.1 | |
| 151 | Lagos low-cost sensors Lagos, Nigeria | 11.1 | |
| 151 | Bakersfield California, United States | 11.1 | |
| 156 | Lake Elsinore California, United States | 11.0 | |
| 156 | Richmond California, United States | 11.0 | |
| 158 | Olsztyn Warmia-Masuria, Poland | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Kielce Świętokrzyskie, Poland | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Bor Central Serbia, Serbia | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Tamana Kumamoto, Japan | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Ōmuta Fukuoka, Japan | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Kasaoka Okayama, Japan | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Włocławek Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 10.9 | |
| 158 | Łask Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 10.9 | |
| 166 | Augustów Podlasie, Poland | 10.8 | |
| 166 | Beigang Taiwan, Taiwan | 10.8 | |
| 166 | Jastrzębie Zdrój Silesia, Poland | 10.8 | |
| 166 | Sarajevo Federation of B&H, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 10.8 | |
| 166 | Houston Texas, United States | 10.8 | |
| 171 | Botevgrad low-cost sensors Sofia, Bulgaria | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Uto Kumamoto, Japan | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Ōyanomachi-noboritate Kumamoto, Japan | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Queenstown Estate low-cost sensors Singapore | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Radomsko Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Racibórz Silesia, Poland | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Elbląg Warmia-Masuria, Poland | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Compton California, United States | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Arao Kumamoto, Japan | 10.7 | |
| 171 | Ayase Kanagawa, Japan | 10.7 | |
| 181 | Legionowo Mazovia, Poland | 10.6 | |
| 181 | Nantou Taiwan, Taiwan | 10.6 | |
| 181 | Zgierz Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 10.6 | |
| 181 | Pasadena Texas, United States | 10.6 | |
| 181 | Chula Vista California, United States | 10.6 | |
| 181 | Manteca California, United States | 10.6 | |
| 187 | Przemyśl Subcarpathia, Poland | 10.5 | |
| 187 | Colombo Western Province, Sri Lanka | 10.5 | |
| 187 | Chaozhou Taiwan, Taiwan | 10.5 | |
| 187 | Sau Mau Ping Kwun Tong District, Hong Kong | 10.5 | |
| 187 | Ōzu Kumamoto, Japan | 10.5 | |
| 187 | Saijō Ehime, Japan | 10.5 | |
| 193 | Warsaw Mazovia, Poland | 10.4 | |
| 193 | Poznań Greater Poland, Poland | 10.4 | |
| 193 | Owariasahi Aichi, Japan | 10.4 | |
| 196 | Kutno Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 10.3 | |
| 196 | Saint Andrews South Carolina, United States | 10.3 | |
| 196 | Rochester Minnesota, United States | 10.3 | |
| 199 | Chiryū Aichi, Japan | 10.2 | |
| 199 | Kraków Lesser Poland, Poland | 10.2 |
Top 200 of 1,545 shown.
Good 0–9.0Moderate 9.1+Unhealthy for sensitive groups 35.5+Unhealthy 55.5+Very unhealthy 125.5+Hazardous 225.5+No data