SmogRank / Rankings

All 2,686 cities by PM2.5, last 24 hours

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 7 Oct (488 monitors). EEA in Spain: no readings since 10 Oct (310 monitors). Catalonia Medi Ambient I Sostenibilitat in Spain: no readings since 9 Oct (26 monitors). Their cities are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =2387CharlotteNorth Carolina, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼159
  2. =2387BrocktonMassachusetts, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1249
  3. =2387North AdamsMassachusetts, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼528
  4. =2387SpringfieldMassachusetts, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1005
  5. =2387MendhamNew Jersey, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼790
  6. =2387Cereslow-cost sensorsCalifornia, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▲110
  7. =2387Goletalow-cost sensorsCalifornia, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▲45
  8. =2387Torrancelow-cost sensorsCalifornia, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼839
  9. =2387DenverColorado, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼479
  10. =2387PuebloColorado, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼521
  11. =2387HurricaneUtah, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▲88
  12. =2387BoiseIdaho, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼272
  13. =2387Coeur d'AleneIdaho, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼179
  14. =2387ButteMontana, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼14
  15. =2387DallasOregon, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼66
  16. =2387TalentOregon, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼85
  17. =2387BellevueWashington, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▲2
  18. =2387EllensburgWashington, United States 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼11
  19. =2387Fort McMurrayAlberta, Canada 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼127
  20. =2387MonctonNew Brunswick, Canada 14 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼99
  21. =2421NewportWales, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼361
  22. =2421Milton KeynesEngland, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼504
  23. =2421HooEngland, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼962
  24. =2421GraysEngland, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼584
  25. =2421LubnjowBrandenburg, Germany 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼263
  26. =2421Landau in der Pfalzlow-cost sensorsRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  27. =2421LimerickMunster, Ireland 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼129
  28. =2421KillarneyMunster, Ireland 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▲81
  29. =2421LourdesOccitanie, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼21
  30. =2421LorientBrittany, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼153
  31. =2421La Ferté-MacéNormandy, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼177
  32. =2421EdgewoodMaryland, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  33. =2421Kennett SquarePennsylvania, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼38
  34. =2421BrandermillVirginia, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼279
  35. =2421BostonMassachusetts, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼602
  36. =2421BangorMaine, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼453
  37. =2421PalmyraNew Jersey, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼145
  38. =2421AllentownPennsylvania, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼334
  39. =2421BensalemPennsylvania, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼216
  40. =2421SuperiorWisconsin, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼2160
  41. =2421DeltaColorado, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼167
  42. =2421BoulderColorado, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼86
  43. =2421Salt Lake CityUtah, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼33
  44. =2421WenatcheeWashington, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼99
  45. =2421SaguenayQuebec, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼443
  46. =2421Helena Valley West CentralMontana, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼207
  47. =2447Kyustendillow-cost sensorsKyustendil, Bulgaria 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  48. =2447FunchalMadeira, Portugal 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼532
  49. =2447IrlamEngland, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼657
  50. =2447BurwellEngland, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼464
  51. =2447FürthHesse, Germany 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼259
  52. =2447SwordsLeinster, Ireland 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼317
  53. =2447RennesBrittany, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼410
  54. =2447DongesPays de la Loire, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼312
  55. =2447GlasgowDelaware, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼134
  56. =2447SeafordDelaware, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼550
  57. =2447LexingtonNorth Carolina, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼440
  58. =2447PhiladelphiaPennsylvania, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼338
  59. =2447DanburyConnecticut, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼703
  60. =2447WaterburyConnecticut, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼702
  61. =2447LowellMassachusetts, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1132
  62. =2447LondonderryNew Hampshire, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1192
  63. =2447WatertownSouth Dakota, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1413
  64. =2447MesquiteNevada, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼39
  65. =2447Red BluffCalifornia, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼113
  66. =2447ReddingCalifornia, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼128
  67. =2447West Valley CityUtah, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼109
  68. =2447Fort St. JohnBritish Columbia, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼161
  69. =2469PoriSatakunta, Finland 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼8
  70. =2469WorcesterEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼447
  71. =2469PortsmouthEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼317
  72. =2469BorehamwoodEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼549
  73. =2469Riemstlow-cost sensorsFlanders, Belgium 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  74. =2469NamurWallonia, Belgium 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼369
  75. =2469Weinheimlow-cost sensorsBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  76. =2469Schwedt (Oder)Brandenburg, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼440
  77. =2469Rottenburglow-cost sensorsBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  78. =2469Bendorflow-cost sensorsRheinland-Pfalz, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  79. =2469VannesBrittany, France 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼277
  80. =2469La Roche-sur-YonPays de la Loire, France 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼621
  81. =2469Nakło nad NoteciąKujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼1298
  82. =2469AthloneLeinster, Ireland 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼468
  83. =2469São SebastiãoSão Paulo, Brazil 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼973
  84. =2469BearDelaware, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼197
  85. =2469WilmingtonDelaware, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼196
  86. =2469QuincyMassachusetts, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼609
  87. =2469CloquetMinnesota, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼1949
  88. =2469ElizabethNew Jersey, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼924
  89. =2469PatersonNew Jersey, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼895
  90. =2469HerrimanUtah, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼19
  91. =2469Spanish ForkUtah, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼28
  92. =2469CasperWyoming, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼376
  93. =2469RanchettesWyoming, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼91
  94. =2494KuopioNorth Savo, Finland 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼41
  95. =2494BallaratVictoria, Australia 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼100
  96. =2494CorroiosSetúbal, Portugal 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  97. =2494Royal Leamington SpaEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼470
  98. =2494HayesEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼512
  99. =2494BarnstapleEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼78
  100. =2494AylesburyEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼700

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China and Turkey, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. Turkey's network doesn't answer requests from outside the country, so we can't read it. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 24 hours to 13 Oct 2026, 05:00 UTC: each city's mean of its hourly values, cities measured in 18 or more of the 24 hours. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Queenstown Estate, #3 Lyubertsy, #4 Gaur, Madhesh, #5 Dubai, #7 Dhaka, #8 Multan, #9 Faisalabad and #10 Gujranwala. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Vietnam's government monitors; Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-13 05:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Vietnam's government monitors; Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).