SmogRank / Rankings

All 2,653 cities by PM2.5, last 24 hours

Every city with enough measurements in this window, worst first.

CPCB in India: no readings since 12 Oct (488 monitors). Their cities are missing from this board, not clean.

  1. =2490PollaCampania, Italy 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼834
  2. =2490BolognaEmilia-Romagna, Italy 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼675
  3. =2490KralendijkBonaire, Bonaire, Saint Eustatius and Saba 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼426
  4. =2490Walla WallaWashington, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼337
  5. =2490Greater SudburyOntario, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼389
  6. =2490Prince AlbertSaskatchewan, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼88
  7. =2490SaguenayQuebec, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼233
  8. =2490ShawiniganQuebec, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1147
  9. =2490Summerlin SouthNevada, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼363
  10. =2510HämeenkyläUusimaa, Finland 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼58
  11. =2510MiddlesbroughEngland, United Kingdom 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼868
  12. =2510BilzenFlanders, Belgium 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  13. =2510SarstedtLower Saxony, Germany 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  14. =2510CorteCorsica, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  15. =2510ChartresCentre-Val de Loire, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼699
  16. =2510BloisCentre-Val de Loire, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼532
  17. =2510AurillacAuvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼369
  18. =2510RijekaPrimorje-Gorski Kotar, Croatia 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼41
  19. =2510Biograd na MoruZadar, Croatia 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼286
  20. =2510GarðabærCapital Region, Iceland 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼693
  21. =2510PortlandMaine, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼495
  22. =2510Saint MichaelMinnesota, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼1975
  23. =2510CeresCalifornia, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼256
  24. =2510CorvallisOregon, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼184
  25. =2510PierreSouth Dakota, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼410
  26. =2510CodyWyoming, United States 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline
  27. =2510LethbridgeAlberta, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼32
  28. =2510Swift CurrentSaskatchewan, Canada 13 US AQI0.2 times the WHO guideline▼14
  29. =2529DunedinOtago, New Zealand 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼612
  30. =2529RottweilBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼190
  31. =2529DürenNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  32. =2529ChâteaurouxCentre-Val de Loire, France 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼577
  33. =2529BourgesCentre-Val de Loire, France 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼439
  34. =2529FredrikstadØstfold, Norway 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  35. =2529Green ValleyArizona, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼460
  36. =2529Carson CityNevada, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼941
  37. =2529MillcreekUtah, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼540
  38. =2529Salt Lake CityUtah, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼246
  39. =2529MontréalQuebec, Canada 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼799
  40. =2529Grand CentreAlberta, Canada 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼123
  41. =2529KallahtiUusimaa, Finland 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼66
  42. =2542TartuTartu, Estonia 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼600
  43. =2542TamperePirkanmaa, Finland 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼328
  44. =2542RiversdaleWestern Cape, South Africa 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼1059
  45. =2542TonbridgeEngland, United Kingdom 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  46. =2542RiemstFlanders, Belgium 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼324
  47. =2542JülichNorth Rhine-Westphalia, Germany 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼408
  48. =2542LondonderryNew Hampshire, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼240
  49. =2542RutlandVermont, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼788
  50. =2542MiddletonWisconsin, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  51. =2542OjaiCalifornia, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼445
  52. =2542Idaho FallsIdaho, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  53. =2542AnacortesWashington, United States 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼82
  54. =2542Fort McMurrayAlberta, Canada 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼332
  55. =2542FrederictonNew Brunswick, Canada 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼213
  56. =2542L'Ancienne-LoretteQuebec, Canada 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼1414
  57. =2542KostelMunicipality of Kostel, Slovenia 12 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼160
  58. =2558OuluNorth Ostrobothnia, Finland 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼594
  59. =2558WeertLimburg, The Netherlands 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  60. =2558AlfeldLower Saxony, Germany 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  61. =2558FontainebleauÎle-de-France, France 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼523
  62. =2558Cañon CityColorado, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼82
  63. =2558PuebloColorado, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼322
  64. =2558HerrimanUtah, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼251
  65. =2558Union GapWashington, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼81
  66. =2566SantanaMadeira, Portugal 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼539
  67. =2566RoermondLimburg, The Netherlands 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼2537
  68. =2566LahrBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  69. =2566Herrsching am AmmerseeBavaria, Germany 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼155
  70. =2566GroßalmerodeHesse, Germany 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼431
  71. =2566DrammenBuskerud, Norway 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼587
  72. =2566AvellinoCampania, Italy 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼269
  73. =2566LawrenceKansas, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼195
  74. =2566Saint CloudMinnesota, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼1479
  75. =2566Stansbury parkUtah, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼107
  76. =2566West Valley CityUtah, United States 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼239
  77. =2566BrossardQuebec, Canada 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  78. =2566MiramichiNew Brunswick, Canada 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼279
  79. =2566OttawaOntario, Canada 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼691
  80. =2566Rivière-des-Prairies–Pointe-aux-TremblesQuebec, Canada 11 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼736
  81. =2581KyustendilKyustendil, Bulgaria 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼322
  82. =2581MilduraVictoria, Australia 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼174
  83. =2581KüssnachtSchwyz, Switzerland 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼396
  84. =2581RixensartWallonia, Belgium 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼395
  85. =2581SchrambergBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  86. =2581HechingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  87. =2581BalingenBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  88. =2581Hawaiian Paradise ParkHawaii, United States 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼725
  89. =2581QuébecQuebec, Canada 10 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼1183
  90. =2590StawellVictoria, Australia 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼164
  91. =2590BangorMaine, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼391
  92. =2590MaranaArizona, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼865
  93. =2590MesquiteNevada, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼266
  94. =2590HurricaneUtah, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼353
  95. =2590BothellWashington, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline
  96. =2590MeadWashington, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼92
  97. =2590RanchettesWyoming, United States 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼305
  98. =2590Münstertal/SchwarzwaldBaden-Wurttemberg, Germany 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼187
  99. =2599ApatityMurmansk, Russia 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼519
  100. =2599CharleroiWallonia, Belgium 9 US AQI0.1 times the WHO guideline▼156

What stands behind each figure: Checked at 2+ sites One reference monitor Low-cost sensors About these marks

Low-cost sensors: consumer units, counted only in cities with no government-grade monitor; they read close to reference monitors on the whole, but 15 to 25% high in humid air. How we use them.

Good0–50
Moderate51–100
Unhealthy for sensitive groups101–150
Unhealthy151–200
Very unhealthy201–300
Hazardous301+

The US EPA's Air Quality Index for PM2.5 (2024 breakpoints). Show values as: µg/m³ · US AQI · India AQI · China AQI · European AQI · UK DAQI · Canada AQHI+. About the scales

Not covered: the government monitoring networks of China, Turkey and Iran, which publish only on their own websites. We are building the reader for China's network. The networks of Turkey and Iran don't answer requests from outside their countries, so we can't read them. Most cities there are missing from this board, not clean. Why.

Use this board

SmogRank, all cities ranked by mean PM2.5 (µg/m³), last 24 hours to 14 Oct 2026, 03:00 UTC: each city's mean of its hourly values, cities measured in 18 or more of the 24 hours. Monitor data from national networks via OpenAQ and the publishers listed at smogrank.com/sources. smogrank.com/rankings. Ranked on low-cost sensors, with no reference monitor in the city: #1 Gaur, Madhesh, #2 Kuala Lumpur, #4 Multan, #5 Faisalabad, #6 Gujranwala, #7 Lilongwe, #8 Lahore, #9 Dhaka and #10 Bahawalpur. Some values from Sensor.Community, ODbL. Some readings from Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published.

Download top 10 (PNG)

You're welcome to reuse a single chart, image or figure with this citation and a link. Terms. Raw monitor readings in bulk are published by OpenAQ, under each provider's licence.

Updated 2026-10-14 03:07 UTC. Values are PM2.5 (fine particles), the median of each city's monitors, as the US AQI PM2.5 sub-index. Some low-cost readings: Sensor.Community, ODbL (data and licence). Some readings: Vietnam's government monitors; Uzhydromet (Uzbekistan's Hydrometeorological Service); Department of Environment, Nepal; Aurassure; RMCAB (Secretaría Distrital de Ambiente, Bogotá); Umhverfisstofnun (Environment Agency of Iceland), no reuse terms published (why we use them).