SmogRank / History / October 2024
Most polluted cities, October 2024
1,561 cities ranked by their average PM2.5 over the 31 days. A city needs measurements on 70% of the days to be ranked.
| # | City | µg/m³ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lahore low-cost sensors Punjab, Pakistan | 151.7 | |
| 2 | Peshawar low-cost sensors Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan | 98.0 | |
| 3 | Kampala low-cost sensors Central Region, Uganda | 95.4 | |
| 4 | Delhi Delhi, India | 93.6 | |
| 5 | Kinshasa low-cost sensors Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo | 79.3 | |
| 6 | Baghdad Baghdad, Iraq | 78.4 | |
| 7 | Dhaka low-cost sensors Dhaka Division, Bangladesh | 75.6 | |
| 8 | Beijing Beijing, China | 60.4 | |
| 9 | Hanoi Hanoi, Vietnam | 55.0 | |
| 10 | Islamabad low-cost sensors Islamabad, Pakistan | 54.3 | |
| 11 | Kolkata West Bengal, India | 47.3 | |
| 12 | Cairo Cairo, Egypt | 43.9 | |
| 13 | Şabāḩ as Sālim Mubārak al Kabīr, Kuwait | 42.2 | |
| 14 | Mumbai Maharashtra, India | 42.0 | |
| 15 | Santa Anita - Los Ficus Lima region, Peru | 39.0 | |
| 16 | N'Djamena N’Djaména, Chad | 38.7 | |
| 17 | Kathmandu low-cost sensors Bagmati Province, Nepal | 38.6 | |
| 18 | Jakarta Jakarta, Indonesia | 38.5 | |
| 18 | Banja Luka Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 38.5 | |
| 20 | Novi Pazar Central Serbia, Serbia | 37.8 | |
| 20 | Hyderabad Telangana, India | 37.8 | |
| 22 | Dushanbe Dushanbe, Tajikistan | 37.7 | |
| 23 | Antananarivo Analamanga, Madagascar | 35.8 | |
| 24 | Užice Central Serbia, Serbia | 34.4 | |
| 25 | Lima Lima Province, Peru | 34.3 | |
| 26 | Valjevo Central Serbia, Serbia | 33.9 | |
| 27 | Kraljevo Central Serbia, Serbia | 33.2 | |
| 28 | Salor Tashkent Region, Uzbekistan | 32.6 | |
| 29 | Lazarevac Central Serbia, Serbia | 30.9 | |
| 30 | Chennai Tamil Nadu, India | 30.8 | |
| 31 | Smederevo Central Serbia, Serbia | 30.3 | |
| 32 | Kigali Kigali, Rwanda | 29.6 | |
| 33 | Ashgabat Ashgabat, Turkmenistan | 29.3 | |
| 34 | Čačak Central Serbia, Serbia | 28.0 | |
| 35 | Debrecen low-cost sensors Hajdú-Bihar, Hungary | 27.2 | |
| 35 | Obrenovac Central Serbia, Serbia | 27.2 | |
| 37 | Niš Central Serbia, Serbia | 27.0 | |
| 38 | Guangzhou Guangdong, China | 26.9 | |
| 39 | Zemun Central Serbia, Serbia | 25.5 | |
| 39 | Bangkok low-cost sensors Bangkok, Thailand | 25.5 | |
| 41 | Ćuprija Central Serbia, Serbia | 25.2 | |
| 41 | Vereeniging low-cost sensors Gauteng, South Africa | 25.2 | |
| 41 | Wan Chai Wan Chai, Hong Kong | 25.2 | |
| 44 | Jacobo Hunter Arequipa, Peru | 24.9 | |
| 45 | Kragujevac Central Serbia, Serbia | 24.7 | |
| 46 | Racibórz Silesia, Poland | 24.0 | |
| 47 | Chiang Mai low-cost sensors Chiang Mai, Thailand | 23.9 | |
| 48 | Skarżysko-Kamienna Świętokrzyskie, Poland | 23.8 | |
| 49 | Tha Bo Nong Khai, Thailand | 23.6 | |
| 50 | Jastrzębie Zdrój Silesia, Poland | 23.1 | |
| 51 | Zgierz Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 23.0 | |
| 51 | Villa Poeta José Gálvez Barrenechea Lima region, Peru | 23.0 | |
| 53 | Sheridan Wyoming, United States | 22.9 | |
| 54 | San Francisco De Borja Lima region, Peru | 22.8 | |
| 55 | Kotō Kumamoto, Japan | 22.6 | |
| 56 | Shanghai Shanghai, China | 22.5 | |
| 56 | Ulan Bator Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia | 22.5 | |
| 58 | Otwock Mazovia, Poland | 22.1 | |
| 58 | Astana Astana, Kazakhstan | 22.1 | |
| 60 | Kielce Świętokrzyskie, Poland | 21.9 | |
| 60 | Tuen Mun Tuen Mun, Hong Kong | 21.9 | |
| 60 | Włocławek Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 21.9 | |
| 60 | Czechowice-Dziedzice Silesia, Poland | 21.9 | |
| 64 | Lublin Lublin, Poland | 21.8 | |
| 65 | Sarajevo Federation of B&H, Bosnia and Herzegovina | 21.7 | |
| 66 | Nyíregyháza Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hungary | 21.6 | |
| 66 | Istanbul low-cost sensors Istanbul, Turkey | 21.6 | |
| 68 | Żywiec Silesia, Poland | 21.5 | |
| 69 | Pirot Central Serbia, Serbia | 21.3 | |
| 69 | Bielsko-Biala Silesia, Poland | 21.3 | |
| 69 | Futog Vojvodina, Serbia | 21.3 | |
| 72 | Addis Ababa Addis Ababa, Ethiopia | 21.1 | |
| 73 | Novi Sad Vojvodina, Serbia | 20.9 | |
| 74 | Belgrade Central Serbia, Serbia | 20.5 | |
| 74 | Fengshan Takao, Taiwan | 20.5 | |
| 76 | Miskolc Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén, Hungary | 20.4 | |
| 77 | Kutno Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 20.1 | |
| 77 | Kalisz Greater Poland, Poland | 20.1 | |
| 79 | Callao Callao, Peru | 20.0 | |
| 80 | San Clemente Ica, Peru | 19.8 | |
| 81 | Działdowo Warmia-Masuria, Poland | 19.7 | |
| 81 | Asunción low-cost sensors Asuncion, Paraguay | 19.7 | |
| 83 | Starachowice Świętokrzyskie, Poland | 19.5 | |
| 83 | Kościan Greater Poland, Poland | 19.5 | |
| 85 | Łuków Lublin, Poland | 19.4 | |
| 85 | Pančevo Vojvodina, Serbia | 19.4 | |
| 85 | Birmingham Alabama, United States | 19.4 | |
| 88 | Nisko Subcarpathia, Poland | 19.3 | |
| 89 | Fanling North District, Hong Kong | 19.1 | |
| 89 | Katowice Silesia, Poland | 19.1 | |
| 91 | Tin Shui Wai Yuen Long, Hong Kong | 18.7 | |
| 92 | Pruszków Mazovia, Poland | 18.6 | |
| 92 | Sremčica Central Serbia, Serbia | 18.6 | |
| 94 | Baku Baki, Azerbaijan | 18.4 | |
| 94 | Legionowo Mazovia, Poland | 18.4 | |
| 96 | Przemyśl Subcarpathia, Poland | 18.3 | |
| 96 | Almaty low-cost sensors Almaty, Kazakhstan | 18.3 | |
| 98 | Łask Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 18.2 | |
| 99 | Radom Mazovia, Poland | 18.1 | |
| 99 | San Tung Chung Hang Islands, Hong Kong | 18.1 | |
| 101 | Jurupa Valley California, United States | 18.0 | |
| 102 | Jurong West Singapore | 17.9 | |
| 102 | Ang Mo Kio New Town Singapore | 17.9 | |
| 102 | Medina Estates low-cost sensors Greater Accra, Ghana | 17.9 | |
| 105 | Zamość Lublin, Poland | 17.8 | |
| 105 | Mong Kok Yau Tsim Mong District, Hong Kong | 17.8 | |
| 107 | Tijuana Baja California, Mexico | 17.7 | |
| 108 | Poznań Greater Poland, Poland | 17.5 | |
| 109 | Augustów Podlasie, Poland | 17.4 | |
| 109 | Radomsko Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 17.4 | |
| 109 | Kraków Lesser Poland, Poland | 17.4 | |
| 112 | Tai Po Tai Po, Hong Kong | 17.2 | |
| 112 | Bartlett Tennessee, United States | 17.2 | |
| 114 | Żyrardów Mazovia, Poland | 17.1 | |
| 115 | Konstancin-Jeziorna Mazovia, Poland | 17.0 | |
| 115 | Kłodzko Lower Silesia, Poland | 17.0 | |
| 115 | Silao de la Victoria Guanajuato, Mexico | 17.0 | |
| 118 | Chocope La Libertad, Peru | 16.9 | |
| 118 | Los Angeles California, United States | 16.9 | |
| 120 | Yongkang Taiwan, Taiwan | 16.8 | |
| 120 | Kaohsiung Takao, Taiwan | 16.8 | |
| 122 | Xinying Taiwan, Taiwan | 16.7 | |
| 123 | Yerevan low-cost sensors Yerevan, Armenia | 16.5 | |
| 124 | Kwai Chung Kwai Tsing District, Hong Kong | 16.4 | |
| 124 | Bydgoszcz Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 16.4 | |
| 126 | Zhushan Taiwan, Taiwan | 16.3 | |
| 126 | Łódź Łódź Voivodeship, Poland | 16.3 | |
| 126 | León de los Aldama Guanajuato, Mexico | 16.3 | |
| 129 | Wawer Mazovia, Poland | 16.2 | |
| 129 | Warsaw Mazovia, Poland | 16.2 | |
| 129 | Tainan Taiwan, Taiwan | 16.2 | |
| 129 | Erlun Taiwan, Taiwan | 16.2 | |
| 133 | Zielona Góra Lubusz, Poland | 16.1 | |
| 133 | Kędzierzyn-Koźle Opole Voivodeship, Poland | 16.1 | |
| 135 | Jarosław Subcarpathia, Poland | 16.0 | |
| 135 | Chaozhou Taiwan, Taiwan | 16.0 | |
| 135 | Tsuen Wan Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong | 16.0 | |
| 135 | Visalia California, United States | 16.0 | |
| 139 | Chiayi City Taiwan, Taiwan | 15.9 | |
| 139 | Little Rock Arkansas, United States | 15.9 | |
| 141 | Aberdeen Southern District, Hong Kong | 15.8 | |
| 141 | Náchod Hradec Králové Region, Czechia | 15.8 | |
| 141 | Hernando Mississippi, United States | 15.8 | |
| 144 | Dębica Subcarpathia, Poland | 15.7 | |
| 144 | Fontana California, United States | 15.7 | |
| 146 | Kościerzyna Pomerania, Poland | 15.5 | |
| 147 | Grajewo Podlasie, Poland | 15.4 | |
| 147 | Szczecin West Pomerania, Poland | 15.4 | |
| 147 | Yauri Cuzco Department, Peru | 15.4 | |
| 150 | Sham Shui Po Sham Shui Po District, Hong Kong | 15.3 | |
| 150 | Opole Opole Voivodeship, Poland | 15.3 | |
| 150 | Riverside California, United States | 15.3 | |
| 153 | Pułtusk Mazovia, Poland | 15.2 | |
| 154 | Douliu Taiwan, Taiwan | 15.1 | |
| 154 | Woodlands Singapore | 15.1 | |
| 154 | Hawthorne low-cost sensors California, United States | 15.1 | |
| 157 | Wrocław Lower Silesia, Poland | 14.9 | |
| 157 | Elbląg Warmia-Masuria, Poland | 14.9 | |
| 157 | Augusta Georgia, United States | 14.9 | |
| 157 | Columbus Ohio, United States | 14.9 | |
| 161 | Victoria Central and Western, Hong Kong | 14.8 | |
| 161 | Gorzów Wielkopolski Lubusz, Poland | 14.8 | |
| 163 | Puli Taiwan, Taiwan | 14.7 | |
| 163 | Bogotá Bogota D.C., Colombia | 14.7 | |
| 165 | Maputo Maputo City, Mozambique | 14.6 | |
| 165 | Sau Mau Ping Kwun Tong District, Hong Kong | 14.6 | |
| 165 | Inglewood low-cost sensors California, United States | 14.6 | |
| 168 | Rzeszów Subcarpathia, Poland | 14.5 | |
| 169 | Płock Mazovia, Poland | 14.4 | |
| 169 | Burbank California, United States | 14.4 | |
| 169 | El Paso Texas, United States | 14.4 | |
| 172 | Olsztyn Warmia-Masuria, Poland | 14.3 | |
| 173 | Toruń Kujawsko-Pomorskie, Poland | 14.1 | |
| 173 | Carson low-cost sensors California, United States | 14.1 | |
| 173 | Fresno California, United States | 14.1 | |
| 176 | Jelenia Góra Lower Silesia, Poland | 13.9 | |
| 176 | Gdynia Pomerania, Poland | 13.9 | |
| 178 | Białystok Podlasie, Poland | 13.8 | |
| 178 | Quezon City low-cost sensors National Capital Region, Philippines | 13.8 | |
| 178 | Lagos low-cost sensors Lagos, Nigeria | 13.8 | |
| 178 | Irapuato Guanajuato, Mexico | 13.8 | |
| 182 | Hanford California, United States | 13.7 | |
| 183 | Nantou Taiwan, Taiwan | 13.6 | |
| 183 | Sha Tin Sha Tin, Hong Kong | 13.6 | |
| 183 | Indianapolis Indiana, United States | 13.6 | |
| 183 | Hattiesburg Mississippi, United States | 13.6 | |
| 187 | Beigang Taiwan, Taiwan | 13.5 | |
| 187 | West Memphis Arkansas, United States | 13.5 | |
| 187 | Nogales Arizona, United States | 13.5 | |
| 190 | Anaheim California, United States | 13.4 | |
| 191 | Sunland Park New Mexico, United States | 13.3 | |
| 192 | Botevgrad low-cost sensors Sofia, Bulgaria | 13.2 | |
| 192 | Strzelce Opolskie Opole Voivodeship, Poland | 13.2 | |
| 194 | Yuanlin Taiwan, Taiwan | 13.1 | |
| 194 | Helena Montana, United States | 13.1 | |
| 196 | Jincheng Fukien, Taiwan | 13.0 | |
| 197 | Conakry Conakry, Guinea | 12.9 | |
| 197 | Gdańsk Pomerania, Poland | 12.9 | |
| 197 | Gulfport Mississippi, United States | 12.9 | |
| 197 | Compton California, United States | 12.9 |
Top 200 of 1,561 shown.
Good 0–9.0Moderate 9.1+Unhealthy for sensitive groups 35.5+Unhealthy 55.5+Very unhealthy 125.5+Hazardous 225.5+No data